So he allegedly does these things months apart and she continues going back to his house...?
And after she was "raped" she definitely didn't think to go to a clinic to get checked out and gather evidence against him.
No evidence, not guilty, case closed.
Sound logic here, how are you not a prosecutor? In fact, you seem to be such an expert on psychology as well, you might as well be, like, The King of Prosecutors. Any sexual assault case must go before you first to determine, just based on what the media reports on the case, if the woman is lying or not. Congratulations!
Sound logic here, why even have trials? If a woman says she was raped, she was raped damn it! This questioning of victims must be stopped before more damage is done. Why would a woman lie about something like this? If a woman says she was raped, put the man (and several of his friends, just to be safe) in prison for as long as she thinks is necessary. Believe all women!
