Antonio Brown accused of rape

[Modernity has failed us]

How dare this woman wait until Antonio was at the pinnacle of destroying his own reputation before coming out with this?!/s

[Modernity has failed us]

So he allegedly does these things months apart and she continues going back to his house...?

And after she was "raped" she definitely didn't think to go to a clinic to get checked out and gather evidence against him.

No evidence, not guilty, case closed.

Sound logic here, how are you not a prosecutor? In fact, you seem to be such an expert on psychology as well, you might as well be, like, The King of Prosecutors. Any sexual assault case must go before you first to determine, just based on what the media reports on the case, if the woman is lying or not. Congratulations!

[Modernity has failed us]

So he allegedly does these things months apart and she continues going back to his house...?

And after she was "raped" she definitely didn't think to go to a clinic to get checked out and gather evidence against him.

No evidence, not guilty, case closed.

Sound logic here, how are you not a prosecutor? In fact, you seem to be such an expert on psychology as well, you might as well be, like, The King of Prosecutors. Any sexual assault case must go before you first to determine, just based on what the media reports on the case, if the woman is lying or not. Congratulations!

I'm pretty sure if it was confirmed by an M.D. that it was violent intercourse, and if DNA was collected after the incident it wouldn't be hidden from the public, as it would ruin his Career before the case even starts.

If for some reason this wasn't publicized and such evidence materializes, then yeah, he's obviously guilty, but I really doubt she will provide any such evidence.

Man, I wonder if there's a reason why women might not immediately go to the police or hospital after being raped, especially if their rapist is a very famous NFL player. And I wonder if she might've continued to hang out with him after these incidents because our culture repeatedly tells women that they weren't "really raped" because of what they were wearing, or that they weren't clear enough in saying no to sex, or that they don't have the evidence to convict their rapist.

I'm not saying Antonio 100% did it and he should have the book thrown at him, but saying "he's innocent because what we know so far indicates he didn't do it" is a really dangerous precedent.

[Modernity has failed us]

So he allegedly does these things months apart and she continues going back to his house...?

And after she was "raped" she definitely didn't think to go to a clinic to get checked out and gather evidence against him.

No evidence, not guilty, case closed.

Sound logic here, how are you not a prosecutor? In fact, you seem to be such an expert on psychology as well, you might as well be, like, The King of Prosecutors. Any sexual assault case must go before you first to determine, just based on what the media reports on the case, if the woman is lying or not. Congratulations!

I'm pretty sure if it was confirmed by an M.D. that it was violent intercourse, and if DNA was collected after the incident it wouldn't be hidden from the public, as it would ruin his Career before the case even starts.

If for some reason this wasn't publicized and such evidence materializes, then yeah, he's obviously guilty, but I really doubt she will provide any such evidence.

Man, I wonder if there's a reason why women might not immediately go to the police or hospital after being raped, especially if their rapist is a very famous NFL player. And I wonder if she might've continued to hang out with him after these incidents because our culture repeatedly tells women that they weren't "really raped" because of what they were wearing, or that they weren't clear enough in saying no to sex, or that they don't have the evidence to convict their rapist.

I'm not saying Antonio 100% did it and he should have the book thrown at him, but saying "he's innocent because what we know so far indicates he didn't do it" is a really dangerous precedent.

Where do you live, Pakistan?

I've never in my life heard anyone here in Europe blame a woman for being raped because of the way she dresses, as no one expects women to wear long black curtains around their body that only expose their eyes.

And yeah, my bad, I should have said: "He is innocent if what we know now does not change and if no hard evidence is presented."

Oh boy. Hate to tell you this, but it's like, a common thing in America for women to be blamed for their own rape because of what they were wearing. Like, to the point that rapists have been given laughably short or even no prison time because the Judge doesn't want to "ruin the life" of a young man who had a lapse in judgement while drunk at a party, but is okay with ruining the life of a young girl who was drinking and did not expect to be raped while drunk at a party.

[Modernity has failed us]

So he allegedly does these things months apart and she continues going back to his house...?

And after she was "raped" she definitely didn't think to go to a clinic to get checked out and gather evidence against him.

No evidence, not guilty, case closed.

Sound logic here, how are you not a prosecutor? In fact, you seem to be such an expert on psychology as well, you might as well be, like, The King of Prosecutors. Any sexual assault case must go before you first to determine, just based on what the media reports on the case, if the woman is lying or not. Congratulations!

Sound logic here, why even have trials?  If a woman says she was raped, she was raped damn it!  This questioning of victims must be stopped before more damage is done.  Why would a woman lie about something like this?  If a woman says she was raped, put the man (and several of his friends, just to be safe) in prison for as long as she thinks is necessary.  Believe all women!

How convenient of you to ignore my next post, which said:

I'm not saying Antonio 100% did it and he should have the book thrown at him, but saying "he's innocent because what we know so far indicates he didn't do it" is a really dangerous precedent.