NH Saint Anselm: warren 25 Biden 24 Sanders 11
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 06:59:55 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  NH Saint Anselm: warren 25 Biden 24 Sanders 11
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NH Saint Anselm: warren 25 Biden 24 Sanders 11  (Read 2052 times)
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,930


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 01, 2019, 05:27:27 PM »


Warren 25%
Biden 24%
Sanders 11%
Buttigieg 10%
Harris 5%
Gabbard 3%
Klobuchar 3%
Steyer 2%
Yang 2%
Booker 1%

https://t.co/qaDUo9neL7?amp=1
Logged
junior chįmp
Mondale_was_an_insidejob
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,396
Croatia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2019, 05:29:15 PM »

Biden is done
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2019, 05:33:43 PM »

Can somebody post the changes from the last poll?
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,330
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2019, 05:34:40 PM »


He should not be nominee, too many gaffes
Logged
Podgy the Bear
mollybecky
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,973


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2019, 05:36:00 PM »


Great--a next door Senator leads by one point.

And think about it--no New Hampshire primary winner has gone on to win the election since 1976.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2019, 05:39:30 PM »

Not a good poll for Sanders, but I don't know anything about this pollster. A one-point win wouldn't be enough for Warren, but if this pollster has done a previous poll, it would be useful to know if this represents an improvement for Warren.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,330
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 01, 2019, 05:42:04 PM »

Biden has lost support among most internet users, the only people holding up Biden are the older Dem voters, thats why he leads in Dixie, where older voters are at.
Logged
Podgy the Bear
mollybecky
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,973


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: October 01, 2019, 05:42:30 PM »

Big drop for Harris since last July's poll.  Warren rising as well as Biden (though less so).

https://www.anselm.edu/new-hampshire-institute-politics/july-poll-shows-biden-harris-warren-leading-new-hampshire
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: October 01, 2019, 05:58:20 PM »

This is actually a drop for Buttigieg and an improvement for Sanders from their last poll. Uh... okay.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: October 01, 2019, 06:11:47 PM »


Great--a next door Senator leads by one point.

And think about it--no New Hampshire primary winner has gone on to win the election since 1976.

Every Iowa caucus winner has gone on to win the election since 1992, and Warren's better positioned there than in NH.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: October 01, 2019, 07:13:19 PM »

Warren 25% (+8)
Biden 24% (+3)
Sanders 11% (+1)
Buttigieg 10% (-2)
Harris 5% (-13)
Gabbard 3% (+2)
Klobuchar 3% (-)
Steyer 2% (+2)
Yang 2% (-3) (must've been the porn tweet)
Booker 1% (-)
Logged
UWS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,240


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: October 01, 2019, 07:34:29 PM »


Great--a next door Senator leads by one point.

And think about it--no New Hampshire primary winner has gone on to win the election since 1976.

Donald Trump won the New Hampshire primary in 2016 and the election.
Logged
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,374
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: October 01, 2019, 09:48:03 PM »


Great--a next door Senator leads by one point.

And think about it--no New Hampshire primary winner has gone on to win the election since 1976.

Every Iowa caucus winner has gone on to win the election since 1992, and Warren's better positioned there than in NH.

Didn't Tom Harkin win the Iowa caucus in 1992?
Logged
Anzeigenhauptmeister
Hades
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,374
Israel


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: October 01, 2019, 10:02:10 PM »

Great--a next door Senator leads by one point.

... and even though there is another popular "next-door senator" competing in NH, she's still leading.

And think about it--no New Hampshire primary winner has gone on to win the election since 1976.

That's as stupid as predicting a Vigo County win for the Democrats because the overall winner has always emerged victorious there since 1956.
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,694
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: October 01, 2019, 10:11:03 PM »

Warren 25% (+8)
Biden 24% (+3)
Sanders 11% (+1)
Buttigieg 10% (-2)
Harris 5% (-13)
Gabbard 3% (+2)
Klobuchar 3% (-)
Steyer 2% (+2)
Yang 2% (-3) (must've been the porn tweet)
Booker 1% (-)

You know what they say in New Hampshire - live free or die hard.
Logged
Arturo Belano
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,471


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: October 01, 2019, 10:34:08 PM »

Warren 25% (+8)
Biden 24% (+3)
Sanders 11% (+1)
Buttigieg 10% (-2)
Harris 5% (-13)
Gabbard 3% (+2)
Klobuchar 3% (-)
Steyer 2% (+2)
Yang 2% (-3) (must've been the porn tweet)
Booker 1% (-)

Wow, more confirmation that Warren was the main beneficiary of Harris' collapse.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,697


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: October 01, 2019, 10:38:08 PM »

Warren 25% (+8)
Biden 24% (+3)
Sanders 11% (+1)
Buttigieg 10% (-2)
Harris 5% (-13)
Gabbard 3% (+2)
Klobuchar 3% (-)
Steyer 2% (+2)
Yang 2% (-3) (must've been the porn tweet)
Booker 1% (-)

So Bernie was 5th place before? Yeah, this isn't exactly a Bernie friendly pollster.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: October 01, 2019, 11:05:06 PM »


Great--a next door Senator leads by one point.

And think about it--no New Hampshire primary winner has gone on to win the election since 1976.

Every Iowa caucus winner has gone on to win the election since 1992, and Warren's better positioned there than in NH.

Didn't Tom Harkin win the Iowa caucus in 1992?

Yeah, I meant noninclusive.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,098
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: October 01, 2019, 11:06:03 PM »

Warren 25% (+8)
Biden 24% (+3)
Sanders 11% (+1)
Buttigieg 10% (-2)
Harris 5% (-13)
Gabbard 3% (+2)
Klobuchar 3% (-)
Steyer 2% (+2)
Yang 2% (-3) (must've been the porn tweet)
Booker 1% (-)

So Bernie was 5th place before? Yeah, this isn't exactly a Bernie friendly pollster.

He’s still barely improving, if at all.
Logged
wbrocks67
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,049


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: October 02, 2019, 05:26:12 AM »

Let's be honest - Harris was never at 18% in NH.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,298
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: October 02, 2019, 09:51:04 AM »
« Edited: October 02, 2019, 09:54:06 AM by KYWildman »

Anyone who sees these numbers and comes to the conclusion “BIDEN is done” rather than “BERNIE is done” needs to go back to first grade math. And make sure it’s real math and not Bernie math this time.

Just to emphasize: Bernie won over 60% of the vote here in 2016. He has zero excuse to be sitting at 11%, less than half the number of two other candidates who are essentially tied. Even one poll with this result is an unbelievably ominous sign for him, and we’ve had several others saying pretty much the same thing.
Logged
NOVA Green
Oregon Progressive
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,435
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: October 03, 2019, 01:28:39 AM »

Anyone who sees these numbers and comes to the conclusion “BIDEN is done” rather than “BERNIE is done” needs to go back to first grade math. And make sure it’s real math and not Bernie math this time.

Just to emphasize: Bernie won over 60% of the vote here in 2016. He has zero excuse to be sitting at 11%, less than half the number of two other candidates who are essentially tied. Even one poll with this result is an unbelievably ominous sign for him, and we’ve had several others saying pretty much the same thing.

Wait Bernie won 60% of the vote in which '16 election in NH?

Not totally tracking your point....
Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,694
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: October 06, 2019, 11:41:52 AM »

Anyone who sees these numbers and comes to the conclusion “BIDEN is done” rather than “BERNIE is done” needs to go back to first grade math. And make sure it’s real math and not Bernie math this time.

Just to emphasize: Bernie won over 60% of the vote here in 2016. He has zero excuse to be sitting at 11%, less than half the number of two other candidates who are essentially tied. Even one poll with this result is an unbelievably ominous sign for him, and we’ve had several others saying pretty much the same thing.

Wait Bernie won 60% of the vote in which '16 election in NH?

Not totally tracking your point....

Bernie got 60.15% of the vote in the Democratic primary in New Hampshire in 2016. If he can only pull 11% in a poll there, it means possibly an outright majority of his 2016 supporters are backing someone else at this point, which isn't exactly a formula for victory.
Logged
RussFeingoldWasRobbed
Progress96
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,243
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2019, 12:08:04 PM »

Bernie is screwed
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,330
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2019, 12:18:57 PM »

NH angry women love Warren, intead of Ukraine Biden
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 14 queries.