Death penalty ruled 'cruel and unusual' - Furman v. Georgia, 1972 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 08:10:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Death penalty ruled 'cruel and unusual' - Furman v. Georgia, 1972 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: The ruling was constitutionally...
#1
sound
 
#2
unsound
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Death penalty ruled 'cruel and unusual' - Furman v. Georgia, 1972  (Read 12646 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: December 26, 2005, 09:18:06 PM »

Generally sound.  Brennan's and Marshall's concurrences (they were the only two who found the death penalty totally unconstitutinal) were unsound.  But the basic finding that the inequitible application of the death penalty constitutes "unusual punishment" is sound.

Woodson v. North Carolina was unsound, but not Furman v. Georgia.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.