Gay marriage map (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 08:06:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Gay marriage map (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Gay marriage map  (Read 30462 times)
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« on: December 30, 2005, 05:01:15 PM »

They should. I was simply pointing out his hypocrisy.

What hypocrisy?  You were complaining about his argument.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2005, 06:28:29 PM »


He refuses to endorse incestuous marriage, while whining about "equal rights" for homosexual couples.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

What are you talking about?

Oh, somehow I managed to read only the first sentence of your post and missed the question about incestuous couples.  I'm a moron.  Sorry.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2007, 06:25:04 PM »

http://www.maine.gov/sos/cec/elec/2005/ref05.htm

Question 1 here.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2007, 06:39:20 PM »
« Edited: February 23, 2007, 06:41:00 PM by Nighthawk »

The map:



Green counties voted to repeal the anti-discrimination law; red ones kept it.

Range was 35% (Cumberland) to 60% (Aroostook).

Interestingly, French Canadians seemed to have narrowly voted yes.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2007, 07:55:37 PM »

Alcon,

Have any other states had any statewide referenda on any gay rights issue other than marriage?

I'll be uploading some more maps related to the homosexual conspiracy this afternoon.  It's one of my favourite issues to track.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2007, 08:16:47 PM »

2006: Colorado narrowly rejects domestic partnerships


Data here

Gains versus Bush performance
Costilla +103.6% (67%)
Conejos +52.8% (59%)
Las Animas +40.7% (41%)
Pueblo +38.5% (38%)
Otero +23.4% (38%)

I think everyone can pretty much figure out what the second number I gave was, and why this measure failed.

On the other hand...

Losses versus Bush performance
Pitkin -21.6%
Summit -17.0%
Eagle -16.3%
Douglas -13.6%
Routt -8.9%

I doubt I need to explain that either.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2007, 08:31:42 PM »
« Edited: February 23, 2007, 08:35:02 PM by Nighthawk »

2006: Colorado passes gay marriage ban


Data here

Worst performances versus Bush
Jackson -27.7
Rio Blanco -12.0%
Kiowa -8.5%
Routt -8.2%
Custer -7.7%

Best performances versus Bush
Costilla +97.5%
Conejos +56.1%
Las Animas +43.4%
Pueblo +43.2%
Denver +28.6%

If anyone can explain to me why Jackson County voted like this:

President - 76% Bush
Domestic partnerships - 76% no
Gay marriage ban - 55% yes

...I'd be interested in hearing it.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2007, 08:49:06 PM »

This is kind of neat: the user-made Colorado maps are on the first page for a Google result for Colorado election results.

Anyway...

2000: Oregon narrowly avoids banning ballroom dancing classes, or whatever a ban on encouraging homosexuality in public schools would do


Data here.  An interesting examination of how attitudes about homosexuality aren't entirely partisan line, and how the inland west isn't nearly as conservative Christian as many people assume based on its Republicanness.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2007, 08:59:58 PM »

Oregon: Difference between Measure 9 performance and 2000 Bush performance
Grant -19.2%
Wallowa -18.9%
Sherman -16.3%
Gilliam -15.6%
Union -14.5%
Harney -12.9%
Lake -12.2%
Benton -11.6%
Baker -9.8%
Malheur -7.6%
Klamath -7.4%
Wheeler -6.8%
Deschutes -5.6%
Morrow -5.5%
Washington -5.0%
Umatilla -4.4%
Jackson -3.6%
Polk -1.0%
Douglas -0.3%
Yamhill -0.2%
Crook +0.5%
Jefferson +0.5%
Curry +2.0%
Coos +2.0%
Wasco +2.1%
Marion +2.3%
Clackamas +2.7%
Josephine +2.9%
Linn +3.2%
Clatsop +4.7%
Lane +4.8%
Tillamook +6.2%
Hood River +6.6%
Lincoln +7.2%
Multnomah +16.2%
Columbia +21.7%

Columbia County makes sense - it's a working-class area with socially conservative, economically liberal leans.  What's interesting is that this measure performed relatively better in areas that hardly seem to have those sort of leans (liberal Multnomah, liberal touristy Lincoln and Hood River) - the only explanation I can offer there is old-school, elderly Democrats (especially in Lincoln) and Hispanics (Hood River).  And the measures tend to perform relatively better than Dems in ultra-liberal areas and relatively worse than Republicans in ultra-conservative ones.

What really surprised me is how poorly it performed in the Columbia River counties, which have a Democratic union(?) tradition.  They were solidly Republican by 2000.  Another thing that I just can't explain.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2007, 09:16:34 PM »


Coos has a solid economically liberal union base, but it's not socially conservative.  The socially conservative union base has since become Republican.  It's a moderate county.  It's pretty much a standard 55% Republican, 45% Democratic county at this point.  It's lost the interestingness that came from being a union county.

Btw, could you explain the patterns in this map?



I might be able to, if I knew what it was a map of.  Tongue
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2007, 09:19:29 PM »

Referendum on exempting death sentences from protections to do with cruel and vindictive punishment.

Ohhh, I remember talking to Bob about this.

No - I have NO idea.  It's among the weirdest maps I've ever seen.  Malheur County is literally the last county in Oregon I would have expected to vote no.  The single most confusing election result I've ever seen.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2007, 09:32:14 PM »

Bob, two quick questions:

1. Where did you get those county results?  (I can do a quick data upload so we can see sexy percentages and stuff)

2. Anything you can tell me about why the Columbia River counties are so Republican if they aren't exactly fully right-winged on either social or economic issues?  More of an institiutional Republican shift, kind of like in Coos County?

I don't know much about them, but in my summer driving tour (after which I'll have been to every county in the state except for San Juan), I'll be right across the stateline.  It doesn't seem to share much in common with our side of the River.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #12 on: February 23, 2007, 10:02:42 PM »

Environmental issues probably play a big role.

Hmm, interesting.  Logging areas?  I've always wondered if areas that are hyper-Republican due to anti-environmentalism (like Forks, WA) are also very socially conservative.  I guess it isn't necessarily so.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2007, 05:05:21 PM »

Looks like about half the states have had a statewide referendum on gay marriage. I made a list earlier this thread about the most gay friendly county in each state. Does anyone want to take a stab at guessing for the other states, what would be each state's best county for opposing gay marriage bans?

My guesses:

AL: Who knows...probably one of the Kerry counties, though, if MS is an indicator
CT: New Haven, maybe?  Hartford?
DE: New Castle
FL: Broward?
IA: Johnson?
IL: Cook, obviously
IN: Monroe
ME: Cumberland
MA: Berkshire
MN: Ramsey
NE: Already voted in 2000, and Douglas
NH: Probably Cheshire
NJ: Essex, maybe Hudson
NM: Taos, maybe Santa Fe
NC: Durham?
PA: Philadelphia
RI: Providence
VT: Windham
WA: San Juan
WV: No real idea
WY: Teton, obviously
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2007, 05:25:17 PM »

Looks like about half the states have had a statewide referendum on gay marriage. I made a list earlier this thread about the most gay friendly county in each state. Does anyone want to take a stab at guessing for the other states, what would be each state's best county for opposing gay marriage bans?
NE: Already voted in 2000, and Douglas

I missed that. Do you have a link to the results or map?

https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=2000&off=61&elect=0&fips=31&f=0

It was later overturned.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2009, 01:50:09 AM »

South Dakota's (like Arizona's) banned domestic partnerships and civil unions.  Those kind of bans just aren't really viable outside of conservative states anymore.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2012, 04:47:12 AM »

Arizona rejected an unusually draconian ban in 2006.

In 2009, Washington State passed a referendum that gave gay domestic partnerships all the civil rights of straight marriages.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


« Reply #17 on: November 16, 2012, 11:54:50 PM »


How come New England isn't more red?  I thought the one state still holding out against gay marriage was Rhode Island.  

Voting results, not legal status.  The Northeast doesn't do many public referendums
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.055 seconds with 12 queries.