What if Ross Perot didn’t withdraw in 1992? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 04:38:17 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  What if Ross Perot didn’t withdraw in 1992? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What if Ross Perot didn’t withdraw in 1992?  (Read 631 times)
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,881
United States


« on: November 03, 2019, 11:59:45 AM »

I think Bush would actually have a chance at a 2nd term in this scenario. Clinton, at times was third in a three man race before Perot withdrew, it wasn't until after Perot exited that Clinton took the lead and when Perot re entered, it was Clinton, not Bush, that took the hit in the polls.
Logged
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,881
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2019, 11:19:41 PM »

Perot was of great help to Clinton I have to admit in the South.

The only southern state that Clinton won that I could see him losing in Perot's absence was Georgia, which he ended up losing in 1996. Arkansas, West Virginia (One of ten Dukakis states and one of 6 Carter 1980 states), and narrowly Tennessee and Kentucky would've stayed Clinton.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.