Rank non-incumbent U.S. presidential nominees by electability since WW2
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:48:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Rank non-incumbent U.S. presidential nominees by electability since WW2
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who was the strongest non-incumbent major party nominee for president since WW2?
#1
Dewey
 
#2
Eisenhower
 
#3
Stevenson ('52 and '56)
 
#4
Kennedy
 
#5
Nixon '60
 
#6
Goldwater
 
#7
Nixon '68
 
#8
Humphrey
 
#9
McGovern
 
#10
Carter
 
#11
Reagan
 
#12
Mondale
 
#13
Bush '88
 
#14
Dukakis
 
#15
Clinton '92
 
#16
Dole
 
#17
Gore
 
#18
Bush '00
 
#19
Kerry
 
#20
Obama
 
#21
McCain
 
#22
Romney
 
#23
Clinton '16
 
#24
Trump
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: Rank non-incumbent U.S. presidential nominees by electability since WW2  (Read 232 times)
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,947
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 15, 2019, 12:11:49 PM »

Rank non-incumbents major party U.S. presidential nominees by electability since WW2. What I mean by electability is how strong of a candidate they are in the general election. If you just want to do since 2000 or whenever, that's fine.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,947
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2019, 12:12:51 PM »

My tiers:

GOAT tier: Eisenhower
Very good tier: None
Good tier: Kennedy, Nixon ('60 and '68), Bush '88, Obama
Average tier: Stevenson ('52 and '56), Humphrey, Reagan, Clinton '92, Kerry, Romney
Below average tier: Dewey, Carter, Mondale, Dukakis, Dole, Gore, McCain, Clinton '16, Trump
Bad tier: Goldwater, McGovern
Logged
😥
andjey
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,510
Ukraine
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2019, 01:19:57 PM »

Dwight Eisenhower
Logged
LAKISYLVANIA
Lakigigar
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,173
Belgium


Political Matrix
E: -7.42, S: -4.78

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2019, 08:05:42 AM »

Eisenhower because electability mattered more than. Other GOP nominees could have lost in 1952.
Logged
thumb21
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,682
Cyprus


Political Matrix
E: -4.42, S: 1.82

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2019, 09:06:29 PM »

I'd say probably Bush I. He could have easily lost that election, but was able to turn it around.

He was the only one on that list who won as the nominee for a party that had already been in power for 8 years - and by a sizeable margin.

The others who won solid victories: Eisenhower, Reagan, Clinton and Obama already had a lot going for them.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,947
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2019, 10:59:44 AM »

I'd say probably Bush I. He could have easily lost that election, but was able to turn it around.

He was the only one on that list who won as the nominee for a party that had already been in power for 8 years - and by a sizeable margin.

I agree that it's an impressive feat, and I think Bush sometimes gets overlooked as a political figure because he lost re-election and is in Reagan's shadow. A lot of times Reagan is given all the credit for Bush winning in '88, and while there's some truth to that, in the aftermath of Iran-Contra Reagan wasn't the electoral titan he had been in '88. On the other hand, one could argue that Bush faced a particularly weak opponent in Dukakis.
Logged
dw93
DWL
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,881
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2019, 07:25:18 PM »

Eisenhower is the obvious answer. The Republicans were favored, but a Taftite could've lost it and I would argue it was Ike that made 52 a landslide.  After that, I would say Clinton '92, Dubya in 2000, and Reagan in 1980 in that order.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 13 queries.