Opinion of GeneralMacArthur

[World politics is up Schmitt creek]

[PSOL]

An insufferable individual that is 100% hostile in his demeanor all the time.

[Horus]

Very rude and nasty for no reason.

[free my dawg]

Demeanor aside, the most galaxy brain poster on this site.

[BP🌹]

I dislike him (to put it mildly) more than I do every poster combined. It's not even his Poe's low-level neoliberalism (and neoconservatism, for that matter). I remember a post of his in a thread about Israel/Palestine, in which he called me a "lying terrorist scumbag". Fortunately, that post was deleted.

[morgankingsley]

Didnt we just have one of these for him

[Santander]

Exceptional poster. Exceptionally bad, that is.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Exceptional poster. Exceptionally bad, that is.

[free my dawg]

I dislike him (to put it mildly) more than I do every poster combined. It's not even his Poe's low-level neoliberalism (and neoconservatism, for that matter). I remember a post of his in a thread about Israel/Palestine, in which he called me a "lying terrorist scumbag". Fortunately, that post was deleted.

He once made a fake post of me telling someone "I hope you get cancer" was justified.

[SWE]

If I were to make a sock account parodying his ideological persuasion and wanted to make it look as bad as possible, I think it would be less over the top than his posting history.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

The fact that he fits in well as an establishment Democrat shows how morally bankrupt the party is.

[Orser67]

I don't agree with him on everything and think it would probably be good if he could chill out a little. But it's also kinda nice to have a strident center-left Democrat to balance out all the strident leftists and the smaller number of strident right wingers.

[GeneralMacArthur]

I dislike him (to put it mildly) more than I do every poster combined. It's not even his Poe's low-level neoliberalism (and neoconservatism, for that matter). I remember a post of his in a thread about Israel/Palestine, in which he called me a "lying terrorist scumbag". Fortunately, that post was deleted.

For the record, this is a lie, and I have receipts.  I can still see that deleted post in the "Moderated Posts" section of my profile.

The only bit that comes close is:

It doesn't make much difference in this argument, honestly, that the Palestinians are a bunch of lying terrorists who murder children, refused to negotiate for decades until they ran out of options, and are officially governed by a terrorist group that wants to commit genocide against the Jews.  It doesn't matter to me that the Israelis are a decent, stable democracy and turned an abandoned desert wasteland into a flourishing mediterranean paradise through sheer grit and determination.  Those are just happy coincidences.

Which is not a personal attack, just a broad-brush indictment of the PLO.

As for the rest, I'd like to challenge you guys to quote the MOST hostile, rude, nasty, hysterical, personal-attack-laden post from my last 50 or 100 posts.  People keep slapping this reputation on me when 95% of my posts are just about policy or campaign strategy.  Yes, they are usually targeted at, or in defense of, a candidate; that is the nature of a forum about candidates and elections.

[BP🌹]

All I read was, "Palestinians". Nothing about the PLO.

[GeneralMacArthur]

All I read was, "Palestinians". Nothing about the PLO.

It was clearer in the context of the thread, specifically about the PLO-IDF conflict, where "the Palestinians" was being bandied about as a synonymous with the PLO and "the Jews" was synonymous with the IDF.

If you are Palestinian and took that post as an attack on you, that was not my intent and I apologize.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Assuming the dude's legit and not just playing a character - certified classcuck who represents the worst aspects of both modern establishment liberals and neocons.  Unironically comparing animosity towards billionaires to right-wing anti-immigrant hysteria is peak bootlicking.

[OSR stands with Israel]

His whole Bill Gates having "only" 30 billion instead of 110 billion as being insane is true because that would mean Microsoft as a whole would not be able to make nearly the impact on society that they did.

[Sorenroy]

It's good to have someone out here doing the work of defending the unfortunate group of overlooked individuals known as billionaires.

[S019]

Massive FF

[John Dule]

I'm a libertarian and even I think he's a corporate shill.

[Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck]

He slandered a longtime, respected poster like SawX (see my signature!) for absolutely no reason and gets his jimmies in a fritz at the thought of the working class being slapped in the face by machine politicians.  An absolutely awful human being who probably kicks puppies.  If he tried to register at AAD I'd probably reject his registration.  

HP.

[Continential]

ThInK oF the BiLLiOnArEs.

HP

[free my dawg]

He slandered a longtime, respected poster like SawX (see my signature!) for absolutely no reason and gets his jimmies in a fritz at the thought of the working class being slapped in the face by machine politicians.  An absolutely awful human being who probably kicks puppies.  If he tried to register at AAD I'd probably reject his registration.  

HP.

Let him in. I'd love to see AAD's reaction to him.