Thread for arguing about Connecticut redistricting (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 07:01:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Thread for arguing about Connecticut redistricting (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Thread for arguing about Connecticut redistricting  (Read 1219 times)
cvparty
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,099
United States


« on: November 19, 2019, 03:55:07 AM »

Likely D. Anyway it would be stupid to target this district considering that Madigan will gerrymander it in order to make it even more D friendly (you know gerrymandering is good when democrats do it.)

Most people who oppose gerrymandering oppose it for both sides, gerrymandering is bad because it's undemocratic not just for partisan reasons. You're just pulling assumptions out of your ass.


Sure.... you’re really gullible if you believe that democratic politicians / progressive third-groups don’t like gerrymandering, they just want it to benefit them and only them, otherwise the League of Women voters and other « good government » liberal organizations would have already challenged congressional maps in MD/IL/CT/OR
in what world is oregon gerrymandered
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.