Why Did LBJ win Florida, the Upper South, and Idaho in 1964?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 06:32:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Why Did LBJ win Florida, the Upper South, and Idaho in 1964?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Why Did LBJ win Florida, the Upper South, and Idaho in 1964?  (Read 3733 times)
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,937
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: November 20, 2019, 05:53:16 PM »

Cause Florida is really not a "Southern" state, plus the GOP/Dixiecrats were not strong enough in the non-Panhandle region to flip it to Goldwater.

Miami-Dade and West-Central Florida saved Johnson in the state.



Funny to see how counties switched from 1960.



Also, I'm kind of surprised LBJ won Bradford and Union counties.

The Florida Panhandle shifted heavily to Goldwater, obviously because of civil rights. Conversely, Johnson picked up Pinellas, Alachua, Charlotte, Brevard, Volusia, and St. Lucie Counties (and did significantly better in Monroe and Miami-Dade than Kennedy), because of the defection of traditionally Republican suburbanites, retirees, and Northern transplants, who disagreed strongly with Goldwater about Social Security and his other policies. The Nixon-Johnson vote was larger than the Kennedy-Goldwater vote; hence, why Johnson won the state, but the margin remained close, as in 1960.

As for Bradford and Union, Johnson did do much worse in those counties than Kennedy had four years prior. There were other counties (i.e. Dixie, Levy Counties), where Johnson's support fell compared to Kennedy's, but that he still managed to hold narrowly.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,463
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: November 20, 2019, 08:13:14 PM »

Also a bit funny that most Kennedy counties in Florida voted for George Wallace 8 years later.

Anyway, in addition to the Deep South/Upper South divide in 1964, there was a bit of a divide between states that seceded in the Civil War and those that did not.  LBJ took only 56% in Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina, yet received a whopping 64% in Kentucky and 68% in West Virginia.  Kentucky and Tennessee rarely vote so differently.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,937
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: November 20, 2019, 09:37:37 PM »

Also a bit funny that most Kennedy counties in Florida voted for George Wallace 8 years later.

Anyway, in addition to the Deep South/Upper South divide in 1964, there was a bit of a divide between states that seceded in the Civil War and those that did not.  LBJ took only 56% in Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina, yet received a whopping 64% in Kentucky and 68% in West Virginia.  Kentucky and Tennessee rarely vote so differently.

This much is true. I've watched CBS's 1964 Election Night coverage on YouTube, and I remember how Kentucky was projected for Johnson as soon as the polls closed. Early returns from Tennessee, however, showed a tight race between him and Goldwater, with Johnson leading by a small margin. Of course, he ultimately went on to win the state by 11%. It was mentioned on here that the issue of TVA privatization is probably what cost Goldwater Tennessee, outweighing the civil rights backlash which might have otherwise handed the state to him.

Looking at the county map for that year, Goldwater held up in ancestrally Republican Eastern Tennessee, won both Knox and Hamilton Counties, and carried the block of Republican counties near Memphis. He also came within 5% in Shelby County, which was majority-white back then. Johnson, conversely, did exceptionally well in the traditionally Democratic rural areas of Central and Western Tennessee, almost certainly because of those TVA concerns:



Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,348


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: November 20, 2019, 09:53:49 PM »

Also a bit funny that most Kennedy counties in Florida voted for George Wallace 8 years later.

Anyway, in addition to the Deep South/Upper South divide in 1964, there was a bit of a divide between states that seceded in the Civil War and those that did not.  LBJ took only 56% in Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina, yet received a whopping 64% in Kentucky and 68% in West Virginia.  Kentucky and Tennessee rarely vote so differently.

This much is true. I've watched CBS's 1964 Election Night coverage on YouTube, and I remember how Kentucky was projected for Johnson as soon as the polls closed. Early returns from Tennessee, however, showed a tight race between him and Goldwater, with Johnson leading by a small margin. Of course, he ultimately went on to win the state by 11%. It was mentioned on here that the issue of TVA privatization is probably what cost Goldwater Tennessee, outweighing the civil rights backlash which might have otherwise handed the state to him.

Looking at the county map for that year, Goldwater held up in ancestrally Republican Eastern Tennessee, won both Knox and Hamilton Counties, and carried the block of Republican counties near Memphis. He also came within 5% in Shelby County, which was majority-white back then. Johnson, conversely, did exceptionally well in the traditionally Democratic rural areas of Central and Western Tennessee, almost certainly because of those TVA concerns:






Wait can you post a link to that 1964 coverage because I can’t seem to find it
Logged
Podgy the Bear
mollybecky
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,968


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: November 20, 2019, 10:42:52 PM »

Also a bit funny that most Kennedy counties in Florida voted for George Wallace 8 years later.

Anyway, in addition to the Deep South/Upper South divide in 1964, there was a bit of a divide between states that seceded in the Civil War and those that did not.  LBJ took only 56% in Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina, yet received a whopping 64% in Kentucky and 68% in West Virginia.  Kentucky and Tennessee rarely vote so differently.

This much is true. I've watched CBS's 1964 Election Night coverage on YouTube, and I remember how Kentucky was projected for Johnson as soon as the polls closed. Early returns from Tennessee, however, showed a tight race between him and Goldwater, with Johnson leading by a small margin. Of course, he ultimately went on to win the state by 11%. It was mentioned on here that the issue of TVA privatization is probably what cost Goldwater Tennessee, outweighing the civil rights backlash which might have otherwise handed the state to him.

Looking at the county map for that year, Goldwater held up in ancestrally Republican Eastern Tennessee, won both Knox and Hamilton Counties, and carried the block of Republican counties near Memphis. He also came within 5% in Shelby County, which was majority-white back then. Johnson, conversely, did exceptionally well in the traditionally Democratic rural areas of Central and Western Tennessee, almost certainly because of those TVA concerns:






Wait can you post a link to that 1964 coverage because I can’t seem to find it

Ditto on that.  I've seen only the initial CBS coverage from 1964 which shows Kentucky and that's all.

The tightness of the early returns in Tennessee was likely due to eastern Tennessee--traditionally Republican and in the eastern time zone.  In comparison to Kentucky, the civil rights issue had some impact in Tennessee (notably in the western part of the state) to reduce Johnson's percentages to the 50s.  But it was a comfortable victory for the Democrats in Tennessee--they won at the presidential level and also won two Senate races in 1964 by comfortable margins.  Not likely to happen again for the foreseeable future.
Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,937
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: November 21, 2019, 01:44:45 AM »

Also a bit funny that most Kennedy counties in Florida voted for George Wallace 8 years later.

Anyway, in addition to the Deep South/Upper South divide in 1964, there was a bit of a divide between states that seceded in the Civil War and those that did not.  LBJ took only 56% in Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina, yet received a whopping 64% in Kentucky and 68% in West Virginia.  Kentucky and Tennessee rarely vote so differently.

This much is true. I've watched CBS's 1964 Election Night coverage on YouTube, and I remember how Kentucky was projected for Johnson as soon as the polls closed. Early returns from Tennessee, however, showed a tight race between him and Goldwater, with Johnson leading by a small margin. Of course, he ultimately went on to win the state by 11%. It was mentioned on here that the issue of TVA privatization is probably what cost Goldwater Tennessee, outweighing the civil rights backlash which might have otherwise handed the state to him.

Looking at the county map for that year, Goldwater held up in ancestrally Republican Eastern Tennessee, won both Knox and Hamilton Counties, and carried the block of Republican counties near Memphis. He also came within 5% in Shelby County, which was majority-white back then. Johnson, conversely, did exceptionally well in the traditionally Democratic rural areas of Central and Western Tennessee, almost certainly because of those TVA concerns:






Wait can you post a link to that 1964 coverage because I can’t seem to find it

Ditto on that.  I've seen only the initial CBS coverage from 1964 which shows Kentucky and that's all.

The tightness of the early returns in Tennessee was likely due to eastern Tennessee--traditionally Republican and in the eastern time zone.  In comparison to Kentucky, the civil rights issue had some impact in Tennessee (notably in the western part of the state) to reduce Johnson's percentages to the 50s.  But it was a comfortable victory for the Democrats in Tennessee--they won at the presidential level and also won two Senate races in 1964 by comfortable margins.  Not likely to happen again for the foreseeable future.

It's fascinating that Haywood County, one of only two majority-black counties in Tennessee (alongside Shelby County), actually voted for Goldwater. Obviously, blacks were still disenfranchised throughout much of rural Tennessee at that time. Haywood County had voted for Kennedy in 1960, and Goldwater gained about 16 percentage points there compared to Nixon. It's obvious that civil rights was the reason why he flipped the county.

Also a bit funny that most Kennedy counties in Florida voted for George Wallace 8 years later.

Anyway, in addition to the Deep South/Upper South divide in 1964, there was a bit of a divide between states that seceded in the Civil War and those that did not.  LBJ took only 56% in Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina, yet received a whopping 64% in Kentucky and 68% in West Virginia.  Kentucky and Tennessee rarely vote so differently.

This much is true. I've watched CBS's 1964 Election Night coverage on YouTube, and I remember how Kentucky was projected for Johnson as soon as the polls closed. Early returns from Tennessee, however, showed a tight race between him and Goldwater, with Johnson leading by a small margin. Of course, he ultimately went on to win the state by 11%. It was mentioned on here that the issue of TVA privatization is probably what cost Goldwater Tennessee, outweighing the civil rights backlash which might have otherwise handed the state to him.

Looking at the county map for that year, Goldwater held up in ancestrally Republican Eastern Tennessee, won both Knox and Hamilton Counties, and carried the block of Republican counties near Memphis. He also came within 5% in Shelby County, which was majority-white back then. Johnson, conversely, did exceptionally well in the traditionally Democratic rural areas of Central and Western Tennessee, almost certainly because of those TVA concerns:






Wait can you post a link to that 1964 coverage because I can’t seem to find it

Here's a link to the 1964 coverage, such as it is, on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWulJlKqEEg&t=1006s. The video is about thirty minutes in length, and only covers the start of the election night. The rest of that night's coverage has never been posted online, so far as I know, and probably never will be, unfortunately. It's frustrating, given that much fuller coverage of the 1960 election is available on YouTube.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,348


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: November 21, 2019, 07:38:01 PM »

LBJ did pretty good in Arkansas as well:

Logged
Calthrina950
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,937
United States


P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: November 21, 2019, 07:48:42 PM »
« Edited: November 21, 2019, 07:52:32 PM by Calthrina950 »


1964 was the 23rd, and last, consecutive time that Arkansas voted Democratic, extending all the way back to 1876. I've read the Wikipedia article on the 1964 election there, which states that white voters in the state struggled with their choices, due to their opposition to the Civil Rights Act and to Goldwater's policy proposals, particularly regarding the TVA, entitlements, and foreign policy. In the end, their policy disagreements with Goldwater won out, and Johnson carried the state by around 13%. However, the civil rights backlash, like in Tennessee, still played a role, and Goldwater flipped several counties in the southern, more diverse regions of the state that Kennedy had won in 1960.

This, however, was more then canceled out by Johnson regaining rural white counties in Central and Northern Arkansas that had defected to Nixon in 1960 because of anti-Catholicism, and that were more concerned by Goldwater's economic and foreign platform than about civil rights. Nevertheless, 1964 was the first election since Reconstruction that Arkansas voted more Republican than the national average, and was an indicator of the state's political future.

Really, if you think about it, Johnson's victories in every Southern state that he won, except for Texas, can be explained by objections to Goldwater's economic and foreign policies, which outweighed civil rights. Were it not for this, and were Goldwater an economically moderate, pro-New Deal Republican like Eisenhower-but with the same opposition to the Civil Rights Act as he had in OTL-he would have swept Tennessee, Arkansas, Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, and Oklahoma. In that instance, those states would have bolted over civil rights, since they wouldn't have had the other policy concerns.
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,053
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: November 22, 2019, 01:57:16 AM »


Arkansas Dixiecrat machine stood out in 1964 from other Wallace 1968 states because; unlike other "Good Ol' Boys" machines in the South; they actually supported the War on Poverty. They had little choice in the matter - Arkansas was the second poorest state in the nation in 1964 (Mississippi was first) with a 47.7% poverty rate (see here), which in those days meant less than $3,000 a year.
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: November 22, 2019, 05:58:23 AM »

Goldwater's support for privatizing the Tennessee Valley Authority must have turned off a lot of voters in the Appalachia/Ozark region.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.227 seconds with 13 queries.