Is a Democrat more likely to win Iowa or Florida
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 12:53:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Is a Democrat more likely to win Iowa or Florida
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Is a Democrat more likely to win Iowa or Florida
#1
Iowa
 
#2
Florida
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 88

Author Topic: Is a Democrat more likely to win Iowa or Florida  (Read 1980 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,736


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: December 06, 2019, 03:55:00 PM »

I say Iowa as Trump's approvals have been consistently higher in FL, Republicans did better in FL than IA in 2018 and Iowa is more elastic.


I think Trump wins Florida 50-49 vs Biden while loses Iowa 50-48 
Logged
Roblox
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,245


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2019, 03:56:17 PM »

My state sucks and all but I'd still bet on it more than a state that voted 8 points to its right in 2016.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2019, 03:57:26 PM »

lmao
Logged
Pericles
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,109


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2019, 03:58:15 PM »

Clearly Florida.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,736


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2019, 03:59:09 PM »
« Edited: December 06, 2019, 04:02:35 PM by Old School Republican »

My state sucks and all but I'd still bet on it more than a state that voted 8 points to its right in 2016.

Iowa is prone to huge swing unlike Florida.  Also in 2018 Dems won the House vote in Iowa by 4 points while losing the house vote in Florida by over 5 points and won half the statewide races there while Dems in FL lost all but one state wide race including losing a race where they held the Senate seat.

IA is basically the Republicans NH while FL is the Republicans NV where Democrats are much likely to win by over 5 point margins in NH but also more likely to win NV as a whole than NH
Logged
538Electoral
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,691


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2019, 03:59:42 PM »

Is there really any debate between a state that voted 1 point for Trump and a state that voted almost 10 points for him?
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,736


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2019, 04:01:17 PM »

Is there really any debate between a state that voted 1 point for Trump and a state that voted almost 10 points for him?

Yes Statewide approval ratings, results in 2018, elasticity
Logged
Woody
SirWoodbury
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,093


Political Matrix
E: 1.48, S: 1.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2019, 04:04:03 PM »


Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2019, 04:07:21 PM »

Clearly ultra-elastic Iowa, in which Republican wins in 2014, 2016, and 2018 were all just flukes, because it's filled to the brim with WWC #Populists who will sprint to the polls to vote for their hero, Scranton Joe (though neoliberal elitist socialist Warren would lose it by 15%+.) Florida, on the other hand, is ultra-inelastic (unless a communist/socialist like Sanders or Warren is the nominee, in which case it'll magically become elastic and vote Republican by at least 8%), and the Democrats have a hard ceiling of a 0.1284852% loss, so even a ridiculously strong and electable candidate like Biden would still just barely lose Florida.

In all seriousness, regardless of the Democratic candidate, FL is Tilt R at most for Trump (even against Sanders or Warren), while IA is Likely R.
Logged
Gracile
gracile
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,060


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2019, 04:08:06 PM »


How a place voted in 2004 is basically irrelevant these days.
Logged
W
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,300
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.71, S: -8.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2019, 04:16:15 PM »

honestly and i will be lambasted for this iowa, candidates are spending a lotta time there while florida is essentially sliding into a bunch of boomer retirement communities. the fact the governorship and senate seat weren't won by dems in 2018 is a horrible sign, while iowa went from 3/4 republican congressional seats to 1/4 dems taking 2.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,736


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2019, 04:18:57 PM »

Clearly ultra-elastic Iowa, in which Republican wins in 2014, 2016, and 2018 were all just flukes, because it's filled to the brim with WWC #Populists who will sprint to the polls to vote for their hero, Scranton Joe (though neoliberal elitist socialist Warren would lose it by 15%+.) Florida, on the other hand, is ultra-inelastic (unless a communist/socialist like Sanders or Warren is the nominee, in which case it'll magically become elastic and vote Republican by at least 8%), and the Democrats have a hard ceiling of a 0.1284852% loss, so even a ridiculously strong and electable candidate like Biden would still just barely lose Florida.

In all seriousness, regardless of the Democratic candidate, FL is Tilt R at most for Trump (even against Sanders or Warren), while IA is Likely R.


Republicans did not win Iowa in 2018 , the Dems won the House popular vote in Iowa by 4 points while the Dems lost the house popular vote by 5 points .


If you wanna judge state wide races well Democrats won 3/6 in Iowa whole they won 1 in Florida
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2019, 04:38:48 PM »

Clearly ultra-elastic Iowa, in which Republican wins in 2014, 2016, and 2018 were all just flukes, because it's filled to the brim with WWC #Populists who will sprint to the polls to vote for their hero, Scranton Joe (though neoliberal elitist socialist Warren would lose it by 15%+.) Florida, on the other hand, is ultra-inelastic (unless a communist/socialist like Sanders or Warren is the nominee, in which case it'll magically become elastic and vote Republican by at least 8%), and the Democrats have a hard ceiling of a 0.1284852% loss, so even a ridiculously strong and electable candidate like Biden would still just barely lose Florida.

In all seriousness, regardless of the Democratic candidate, FL is Tilt R at most for Trump (even against Sanders or Warren), while IA is Likely R.


Republicans did not win Iowa in 2018 , the Dems won the House popular vote in Iowa by 4 points while the Dems lost the house popular vote by 5 points .


If you wanna judge state wide races well Democrats won 3/6 in Iowa whole they won 1 in Florida

And how does Steve King dragging down the Republican House vote in IA while Democrats underperformed in FL-26 and FL-27 prove that Trump is going to crater in IA while holding all of his support or even gaining some in FL? I don't remember Trump doing better in NV than NC, even though Republicans did quite a bit better in the House vote in NV in 2014 than in NC.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,736


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2019, 04:44:51 PM »

Clearly ultra-elastic Iowa, in which Republican wins in 2014, 2016, and 2018 were all just flukes, because it's filled to the brim with WWC #Populists who will sprint to the polls to vote for their hero, Scranton Joe (though neoliberal elitist socialist Warren would lose it by 15%+.) Florida, on the other hand, is ultra-inelastic (unless a communist/socialist like Sanders or Warren is the nominee, in which case it'll magically become elastic and vote Republican by at least 8%), and the Democrats have a hard ceiling of a 0.1284852% loss, so even a ridiculously strong and electable candidate like Biden would still just barely lose Florida.

In all seriousness, regardless of the Democratic candidate, FL is Tilt R at most for Trump (even against Sanders or Warren), while IA is Likely R.


Republicans did not win Iowa in 2018 , the Dems won the House popular vote in Iowa by 4 points while the Dems lost the house popular vote by 5 points .


If you wanna judge state wide races well Democrats won 3/6 in Iowa whole they won 1 in Florida

And how does Steve King dragging down the Republican House vote in IA while Democrats underperformed in FL-26 and FL-27 prove that Trump is going to crater in IA while holding all of his support or even gaining some in FL? I don't remember Trump doing better in NV than NC, even though Republicans did quite a bit better in the House vote in NV in 2014 than in NC.

Florida is the Republicans Nevada while Iowa is their New Hampshire in the sense that New Hampshire like Iowa are prone to huge swings while Florida like Nevada has a very very stubborn lean .

Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2019, 04:59:35 PM »

Clearly ultra-elastic Iowa, in which Republican wins in 2014, 2016, and 2018 were all just flukes, because it's filled to the brim with WWC #Populists who will sprint to the polls to vote for their hero, Scranton Joe (though neoliberal elitist socialist Warren would lose it by 15%+.) Florida, on the other hand, is ultra-inelastic (unless a communist/socialist like Sanders or Warren is the nominee, in which case it'll magically become elastic and vote Republican by at least 8%), and the Democrats have a hard ceiling of a 0.1284852% loss, so even a ridiculously strong and electable candidate like Biden would still just barely lose Florida.

In all seriousness, regardless of the Democratic candidate, FL is Tilt R at most for Trump (even against Sanders or Warren), while IA is Likely R.


Republicans did not win Iowa in 2018 , the Dems won the House popular vote in Iowa by 4 points while the Dems lost the house popular vote by 5 points .


If you wanna judge state wide races well Democrats won 3/6 in Iowa whole they won 1 in Florida

And how does Steve King dragging down the Republican House vote in IA while Democrats underperformed in FL-26 and FL-27 prove that Trump is going to crater in IA while holding all of his support or even gaining some in FL? I don't remember Trump doing better in NV than NC, even though Republicans did quite a bit better in the House vote in NV in 2014 than in NC.

Florida is the Republicans Nevada while Iowa is their New Hampshire in the sense that New Hampshire like Iowa are prone to huge swings while Florida like Nevada has a very very stubborn lean .



New Hampshire is susceptible to huge swings? Funny, I don't think Senator Scott Brown (R-NH) or still Senator Ayotte got the memo. I also don't remember Heller and Laxalt only losing by 0.5% or less. Mark my words, Iowa is not voting left of Florida, even is Sanders is the nominee. If Trump loses Iowa, he's lost the election in a huge landslide, and has absolutely lost Florida as well.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,533
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: December 06, 2019, 05:01:13 PM »

The one Trump carried by a point, not the one he won by 9.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: December 06, 2019, 05:02:11 PM »

Few things are more dishonest and pathetic than cherry-picking election results to promote your own little ridiculous narrative (apparently "House popular vote" and """elasticity""" are the only useful indicators in IA, while in FL it’s the 2018 SEN/GOV results, in GA it’s the fact that Democrats didn’t win a single statewide office in 2018, in NV it’s "calculated" 2016->2018 "trends", etc.).

Trump barely won FL by supercharging rural/exurban turnout and maxing out the (declining) White vote to a level not seen in three decades. If he’s hemorrhaging enough White/rural support (or voter turnout among those groups) to lose a Republican-trending 90% white state he won by 9% in 2016, there’s no way in hell he’s winning a 60% white state he only won by 1% in 2016 after going through hell and high water (and no, he’s not matching Scott's or DeSantis' numbers in Miami-Dade County).

Using Occam's Razor isn’t always a bad approach, try it out.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: December 06, 2019, 05:09:04 PM »

Clearly ultra-elastic Iowa, in which Republican wins in 2014, 2016, and 2018 were all just flukes, because it's filled to the brim with WWC #Populists who will sprint to the polls to vote for their hero, Scranton Joe (though neoliberal elitist socialist Warren would lose it by 15%+.) Florida, on the other hand, is ultra-inelastic (unless a communist/socialist like Sanders or Warren is the nominee, in which case it'll magically become elastic and vote Republican by at least 8%), and the Democrats have a hard ceiling of a 0.1284852% loss, so even a ridiculously strong and electable candidate like Biden would still just barely lose Florida.

In all seriousness, regardless of the Democratic candidate, FL is Tilt R at most for Trump (even against Sanders or Warren), while IA is Likely R.


Republicans did not win Iowa in 2018 , the Dems won the House popular vote in Iowa by 4 points while the Dems lost the house popular vote by 5 points .


If you wanna judge state wide races well Democrats won 3/6 in Iowa whole they won 1 in Florida

And how does Steve King dragging down the Republican House vote in IA while Democrats underperformed in FL-26 and FL-27 prove that Trump is going to crater in IA while holding all of his support or even gaining some in FL? I don't remember Trump doing better in NV than NC, even though Republicans did quite a bit better in the House vote in NV in 2014 than in NC.

Florida is the Republicans Nevada while Iowa is their New Hampshire in the sense that New Hampshire like Iowa are prone to huge swings while Florida like Nevada has a very very stubborn lean .

This is quite possibly the worst counterargument I’ve ever read on this forum. You didn’t address a single point he made, even though all of them are valid.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,618
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: December 06, 2019, 06:07:00 PM »

Neither will vote D, Iowa is safe R and so is FL.
Logged
Progressive Pessimist
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,080
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -7.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: December 06, 2019, 07:06:47 PM »

I'm not as bearish on Iowa as so many others are, but Florida. Just barely. The Democrat won't actually win either of them though.
Logged
morgankingsley
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,018
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: December 06, 2019, 07:07:37 PM »

Florida
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,618
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: December 06, 2019, 09:39:14 PM »

Florida is too conservative and Reynolds is extremely popular
Logged
SN2903
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,676
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.48, S: 3.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: December 06, 2019, 10:10:12 PM »

Iowa barely but they have no chance in either.
Logged
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,301
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: December 06, 2019, 10:42:07 PM »

Voting Iowa over Florida in this poll is just to blatantly spit in the face of absolutely all logic, reason, and math that has been discovered over the course of thousands of years of human history, by some of the greatest geniuses of all-time.

And for what?

Some ridiculous meme about Florida being Titanium R and Iowa being ElAsTiC?

For shame.
Logged
Podgy the Bear
mollybecky
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,975


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: December 06, 2019, 10:50:30 PM »

I can see Trump's margin go down in IA but go up in FL.  The influx of retirees to SW Florida, suburban Tampa Bay, and the Villages is enormous--a large conservative population that votes.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 15 queries.