Project BioShield
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:37:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Project BioShield
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How would you have voted on this legislation?
#1
Democrat -Aye
 
#2
Democrat -Nay
 
#3
Republican -Aye
 
#4
Republican -Nay
 
#5
independent/third party -Aye
 
#6
independent/third party -Nay
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 13

Author Topic: Project BioShield  (Read 1234 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,541
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 24, 2006, 12:10:41 PM »
« edited: January 24, 2006, 12:14:59 PM by Frodo »

Full Text of the Project BioShield Act of 2003
 
Official Title of Legislation:

HR 2122: To enhance research, development, procurement, and use of biomedical countermeasures to respond to public health threats affecting national security, and for other purposes.

Project Vote Smart's Synopsis:

Vote to pass a bill that would authorize the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to carry out Project Bioshield.

Highlights:

- $5.6 billion was authorized for fiscal years 2004 to 2113, with strict limitations

- Specified only $3.4 billion to be used between fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2008

- Only $890 million of the $3.4 billion can be used in fiscal 2004

- Project Bioshield is an initiative to research and develop vaccines, medications, and other countermeasures to combat biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological bioterrorism threats to our national security

- Allows the Secretary of HHS to allow the use of “unapproved products” in the event of an emergency

- Speeds up the process of authorization for funds for research and purchase of agents to combat bioterrorism


Bill Number: HR 2122 - 108th Congress (2003-2004)

House Passage Vote: 7/16/2003: Passed: 421 - 2 (Roll no. 373).

Senate Passage Vote: 7/17/2003: No vote taken; placed on Senate Legislative Calendar.
Logged
MODU
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,023
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2006, 12:49:55 PM »



I vote yes. 
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2006, 01:23:46 PM »

I'm only voting 'aye' because it is the Department of Health and Human Services, which needs an enormous budgetary increase, and not the Defense Department, which needs to be greatly downsized.
Logged
Moooooo
nickshepDEM
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,909


Political Matrix
E: -0.52, S: 3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2006, 01:28:00 PM »

Yea
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,625
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2006, 11:25:22 AM »

I'd vote Aye.
Logged
Serenity Now
tomm_86
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,174
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2006, 10:49:45 AM »

aye, better safe than sorry.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.