John Bull's Revenge (1825 New England election)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 09:59:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  John Bull's Revenge (1825 New England election)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Election for the third general court of New England.
#1
Whigs (Oliver Wolcott, Jr.)
 
#2
Democratic (Levi Woodbury)
 
#3
Ultra (John Lowell, Jr.)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 16

Author Topic: John Bull's Revenge (1825 New England election)  (Read 229 times)
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 15, 2020, 12:57:24 PM »

The administration of Oliver Wolcott was at once moderate and acrimonious, for as assuredly as the liberal reforms introduced by the second general court moved too far and too quickly for the Ultra minority in the legislature, the opposite criticism was leveled by the radicals, who under the leadership of Levi Woodbury for the first time offered an organized and strident opposition to the government at Springfield. Yet nothing the Democrats could bring was half so damning as the outcry which followed the formal disestablishment of the Congregationalist Church in 1821, as the republic's clergy condemned Wolcott from every pulpit in New England, predicting the abolition of tithes and mandatory church attendance would presage an era of immorality, lawlessness, and the decline of civic virtue. As with so much, Wolcott would have to take his lumps, seeking comfort in the belief that the majority of New Englanders cared more that their purses would now be a bit heavier than that their neighbors might observe the Sabbath at a Baptist church or temple.

In the realm of foreign affairs, Wolcott's legacy was contained in an 1823 address to the general court often referenced by later generations simply as the "Wolcott Doctrine." In its immediate context, the address was a response to the collapse of Spanish rule in Florida, as the imperial authorities proved unable to contain rising conflict between the local Seminole population and American settlers pressing south from Georgia. Rather than annex the territory outright (and act which would certainly have led to war), British diplomats proposed the declaration of an independent Seminole republic with the joint support of the United Kingdom and New England. Instead, Wolcott opted to chart his own course. He recognized the Seminole Nation as a sovereign power and warned New England would oppose any attempt to annex the territory. This essentially reiterated the British position and was met with cheers from the Ultraist end of the chamber; but Wolcott kept speaking. The era of colonization, he declared was at an end; an attempt to make the Seminole Nation a puppet of foreign powers—indeed, any attempt by the kingdoms of Europe or the United States to extend their rule across the American continent—would meet with New England's strident opposition.

In 1823 New England had hardly the muscle to enforce this doctrine; but in expressing it, Wolcott established that the confederacy would not be the puppet of British interests in North America, charting an independent course that pleased neither radicals nor ultras but won the praise of many, including John Quincy Adams. In the approach of the 1825 elections, Wolcott, reselected as leader of the governing Whig party, defends his record against opponents from the right and left. His party call for an independent foreign policy, a moderate protective tariff, support for current naturalization laws (allowing immigrants to apply for citizenship after seven years of residence), and the separation of church and state. The Democrats, led again by Levi Woodbury, campaign on the issue of universal manhood suffrage: they seek a firm league of friendship with the United States, condemning Wolcott for his failure to explicitly condemn the British occupation of New Orleans, free trade, abolition of debtors' prison, and liberal naturalization laws. Finally, the Ultras have declared total war on Wolcott for his "betrayal" of Britain and the disestablishment of the Congregationalist church; they support a steep tariff and are broadly opposed to the social reforms proposed by the Whigs.

Two days.
Logged
Elcaspar
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,136
Denmark


Political Matrix
E: -7.61, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2020, 01:52:45 PM »

It's gotta be the Democrats again for me.
Logged
Lumine
LumineVonReuental
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,653
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2020, 02:05:15 PM »

Back to the Ultras it is, Mr. Wolcott has gone too far.
Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,891
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2020, 03:17:57 PM »

Whig. Tempted to vote Ultra based on foreign policy but I disagree with the rest of their policies
Logged
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,323
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2020, 05:05:57 PM »

Whig
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2020, 06:20:54 PM »

1825 New England general election
Praised initially in the Whig press for its comely reflection of the president's independence and strength of character, Wolcott's "Second of December Address" would in time come to be viewed as a strategic blunder. Having pleased neither the Anglophiles nor the Americophiles in the general court, the ruling party soon found itself with few friends and a host of enemies. The 1825 elections consequently were a rout, with the Whigs holding onto the much-diminished center while radicals  flocked to Woodbury's Democrats whilst Hamiltonians and Tories rallied around Lowell's Ultra banner. Though both opposition parties made impressive gains, neither was able to take a majority in the House or Senate nor amass the 344 votes necessary to elect a president, presaging a lively contest when the third general court formally convened at Springfield.

Ultra (John Lowell, Jr.) 206 (+127) delegates + 57 (+46) senators
Democratic (Levi Woodbury) 206 (+67) delegates + 56 (+8) senators
Whig (Oliver Wolcott, Jr.) 138 (-132) delegates + 23 (-38) senators
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.235 seconds with 14 queries.