Fox News poll : Trump trails every democrat

[Frenchrepublican]

https://www.scribd.com/document/444324295/Fox-January-19-22-2020-National-Topline-January-26-Release-pdf

Trump vs Biden : Biden 50/41
Trump vs Sanders : Sanders 48/42
Trump vs Warren : Warren 47/42
Trump vs Buttigieg : Buttigieg 45/41

The sample is 48 D vs 42 R and Trump approval is -9.

[Holy Unifying Centrist]

Horrible numbers for Pete Buttigieg. Sad!

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Disastrous polls from a news source that says Trump should be acquitted 😁😁😁

[Sam Smith]

Fake News!

[Frenchrepublican]

Fake News!

Wouldn't go that far but it's clear that Fox News polls are by far some of the less Trump friendly ones

[Vaccinated Russian Bear]

Biden   +9
Bloomberg   +8
Sanders   +6
Warren   +5
Klobuchar   +1
Buttigieg   +4


       for Trump

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Fake News!

Wouldn't go that far but it's clear that Fox News polls are by far some of the less Trump friendly ones

Trump is gonna get blown out and our Red state Dems like James Mackler and Greenfield and Heger have a chance at winning

[Obama-Biden Democrat]

#BIDENUNDER50

[Gone to Carolina]

Honest and trustworthy?, Yes/No:
Sanders 55%/35% (+20)
Buttigieg 42%/33% (+9)
Warren 46%/40% (+6)
Klobuchar 37%/32% (5)
Biden 46%/45% (+1)
Bloomberg 38%/37% (1)

Trump 38%/58 (-20)

Interesting numbers.

[Sir Mohamed]

A sitting prez who can't get above 42% against any Dem including an 38 year old gay mayor of a city of 100k is embarrassing for the said prez but good for the country.

[Progressive Pessimist]

A sitting prez who can't get above 42% against any Dem including an 38 year old gay mayor of a city of 100k is embarrassing for the said prez but good for the country.

It is, but it's only a poll. Let's wait for the actual election results before we consider our populace redeemed.

[HAnnA MArin County]

Fake News!

Wouldn't go that far but it's clear that Fox News polls are by far some of the less Trump friendly ones

The Deep State must be getting to the pollsters over at the State Propaganda Channel.

[pppolitics]

This numbers are nice and all, but the problem is that the president isn't chosen by the popular vote.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

As we see, voters are making up their minds and it changes from day to day, Trump, if he had a pro growth agenda, not just a tax cut for the rich agenda; consequently,  he can excuse the impeachment,  but he has no pro growth agenda-raising minimum wage with housing cost

[MT Treasurer]

Okay, but I was told that anyone who thinks Trump is in a worse position than in 2016 is engaging in "revisionist history." I mean, if even Hillary couldn’t beat him, who the hell can?!

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Okay, but I was told that anyone who thinks Trump is in a worse position than in 2016 is engaging in "revisionist history." I mean, if even Hillary couldn’t beat him, who the hell can?!

Trump has a record and he promised to reduce the deficit. He complained Obama had a terrible economy. This is a referendum on Trump and also his corruption

[ElectionsGuy]

Okay, but I was told that anyone who thinks Trump is in a worse position than in 2016 is engaging in "revisionist history." I mean, if even Hillary couldn’t beat him, who the hell can?!

lmao you want to respond to me directly? Because this is pretty petty.

[Frenchrepublican]

Okay, but I was told that anyone who thinks Trump is in a worse position than in 2016 is engaging in "revisionist history." I mean, if even Hillary couldn’t beat him, who the hell can?!

Cherry picking the worst poll (from a Trump perspective) in order to back up your point......that’s not very fair

Trump is only down by 4 in the polling average which is not that bad

[MT Treasurer]

Okay, but I was told that anyone who thinks Trump is in a worse position than in 2016 is engaging in "revisionist history." I mean, if even Hillary couldn’t beat him, who the hell can?!

Cherry picking the worst poll (from a Trump perspective) in order to back up your point......that’s not very fair

Trump is only down by 4 in the polling average which is not that bad

"only"

Also, that’s worse than in 2016, despite his supposed incumbency "advantage" and the "weak" Democratic field. In no way is it outlandish to suggest that he’s in a worse position than he was four years ago.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Okay, but I was told that anyone who thinks Trump is in a worse position than in 2016 is engaging in "revisionist history." I mean, if even Hillary couldn’t beat him, who the hell can?!

Cherry picking the worst poll (from a Trump perspective) in order to back up your point......that’s not very fair

Trump is only down by 4 in the polling average which is not that bad

He still is behind and in 2012, Obama and Biden won 51-47 and they won IA, Ohio and FL. If Trump loses by 6, it's a 2008 election, like he is in Fox polls

[Frenchrepublican]

Okay, but I was told that anyone who thinks Trump is in a worse position than in 2016 is engaging in "revisionist history." I mean, if even Hillary couldn’t beat him, who the hell can?!

Cherry picking the worst poll (from a Trump perspective) in order to back up your point......that’s not very fair

Trump is only down by 4 in the polling average which is not that bad

"only"

Also, that’s worse than in 2016, despite his supposed incumbency "advantage" and the "weak" Democratic field. In no way is it outlandish to suggest that he’s in a worse position than he was four years ago.

What you’re writing here is simply untrue. Trump was usually down by far more than -4 points during most of the 2016 campaign, you can make the argument that Trump is weaker than 4 years ago and that he will lose by a high single digit margin but national polls (when averaged) are not backing up this idea.

[MT Treasurer]

Okay, but I was told that anyone who thinks Trump is in a worse position than in 2016 is engaging in "revisionist history." I mean, if even Hillary couldn’t beat him, who the hell can?!

Cherry picking the worst poll (from a Trump perspective) in order to back up your point......that’s not very fair

Trump is only down by 4 in the polling average which is not that bad

"only"

Also, that’s worse than in 2016, despite his supposed incumbency "advantage" and the "weak" Democratic field. In no way is it outlandish to suggest that he’s in a worse position than he was four years ago.

What you’re writing here is simply untrue. Trump was usually down by far more than -4 points during most of the 2016 campaign, you can make the argument that Trump is weaker than 4 years ago and that he will lose by a high single digit margin but national polls (when averaged) are not backing up this idea.

I was talking about the RCP average on election day, but whatever. It’s not just the national polls, the swing state polls (especially WI/MI/PA/AZ) are also pretty terrible for him.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Trump isnt gonna win 278, regardless of a wave or not, but 2019 was a wave we won KY, LA and KS Gov; consequently, a OH, IA, FL arent MO, IN and WVa; consequently,  every Dem elected as: Clinton and Obama won those states. We have elected Dem Senators in those states: Bill Nelson, Bob Graham, Tom Harkin and Sherrod Brown. OH, IA and FL arent red states. They are purple

[Progressive Pessimist]

This numbers are nice and all, but the problem is that the president isn't chosen by the popular vote.

While true, a large enough popular vote win basically corresponds with an electoral win. The Democrat should probably aim for winning by at least three points or more.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

These are terrible numbers for Trump with his nonexistent pro growth agenda and tax cuts for rich