PA-Sen: Santorum down 16

[nini2287]

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/February%202006/Pennsylvania%20Senate%20February.htm

Rasmussen:

Casey 52
Santorum 36

[MissCatholic]

this is becoming a complete farce. We are beginning to see the size of the republican fanatism in PA at roughly 34-35%. Keystone Phil is a full member.

[© tweed]

Although I can totally see his getting his ass handed to him, I still think this margin is far too wide to be accurate.

This margin is consistent with that shown by other polls.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x11379.xml?ReleaseID=873

[TeePee4Prez]

I can forsee a liberal/Green party pro-choice candidate siphoning from Casey once this gets started.

[°Leprechaun]

I can forsee a liberal/Green party pro-choice candidate siphoning from Casey once this gets started.

It wouldn't surprise me at all to see Santorum beat Casey with less than 50% of the vote.
By the way, I can see why want Hoeffel to run (although it doesn't look like it is going to happen at this point); I am sure he could beat Santorum
I really don't why he would run against Specter and not against Santorum.

[Democratic Hawk]

[bullmoose88]

Although I can totally see his getting his ass handed to him, I still think this margin is far too wide to be accurate.

This margin is consistent with that shown by other polls.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x11379.xml?ReleaseID=873

I know that, I don't believe that any of them are as accurate as they could be.

I agree with tricky dick here

[© tweed]

Although I can totally see his getting his ass handed to him, I still think this margin is far too wide to be accurate.

This margin is consistent with that shown by other polls.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x11379.xml?ReleaseID=873

I know that, I don't believe that any of them are as accurate as they could be.

I agree with tricky dick here

When a bunch of polls show pretty much the same thing, you're fighting common sense if you deem them all inaccurate.

[Sam Spade]

So, when is Casey going to start actuallysaying something so that we can get a feeling of where this race is going to be heading?

Or is that simply not going to happen. 

[bullmoose88]

So, when is Casey going to start actuallysaying something so that we can get a feeling of where this race is going to be heading?

Or is that simply not going to happen. 

If he's smart...he'll take a prolonged vacation until december...

because if he debates santorum...rick's gonna kill him.

[© tweed]

So, when is Casey going to start actuallysaying something so that we can get a feeling of where this race is going to be heading?

Or is that simply not going to happen. 

At this point, there is absolutely no reason for Casey to say anything of substance.  I agree with Bullmoose -- it would be wise for Casey not to debate Santorum, because if he did, he'd get crushed.

[minionofmidas]

I don't think these polls are inaccurate ... but they're polls, not predictions. As predictions, they probably are inaccurate ... Santorum will *likely* creep closer.

[Gustaf]

If you're this far ahead you don't want anything to happen, whatsoever.