Rasmussen: McCaskill 46%, Talent 43%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 08:46:22 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  Rasmussen: McCaskill 46%, Talent 43%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rasmussen: McCaskill 46%, Talent 43%  (Read 1648 times)
Sarnstrom
sarnstrom54014
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 679


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 27, 2006, 07:55:18 PM »
« edited: May 09, 2006, 11:06:31 AM by Dave Leip »

March 11, 2006--Our latest survey of the race for Missouri Senate shows State Auditor Claire McCaskill (D) leading Senator Jim Talent (R) 43% to 40%.

Beginning with this survey, Rasmussen Reports will release data for a three-poll rolling average on our state election polls. Used in conjunction with individual survey results, this tool will help determine whether shifting poll results are due to changes in the race or are merely statistical noise.

The Missouri race remains hotly competitive, with our three-poll rolling average showing a 43% to 43% tie. During those 3 polls, McCaskill and Talent each had one survey result above the average, one below the average, and one matching the average. The previous three-poll rolling average showed the candidates tied at 45%.

All indicators point to a race that may remain close right up to Election Day.

Senator Talent, who won his seat in 2002 by defeating appointed incumbent Senator Jean Carnahan in a special election, is viewed favorably by 56% of respondents, unfavorably by 37%.

McCaskill is viewed favorably by 57%, unfavorably by 36%. McCaskill won the Democratic nomination for governor two years ago by defeating the incumbent governor, but went on to lose the general election to the Republican, Matt Blunt.

Rasmussen
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2006, 08:32:02 PM »



Senator Talent, who won his seat in 2002 by defeating appointed incumbent Senator Jean Carnahan in a special election, is viewed favorably by 56% of respondents, unfavorably by 37%.

Ok so we now know that this isn't an Anti-Talent situation. I guess it's because of the problems with the national and state (because of Governor Blunt's unpopular status) parties.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2006, 08:57:06 PM »



Senator Talent, who won his seat in 2002 by defeating appointed incumbent Senator Jean Carnahan in a special election, is viewed favorably by 56% of respondents, unfavorably by 37%.

Ok so we now know that this isn't an Anti-Talent situation. I guess it's because of the problems with the national and state (because of Governor Blunt's unpopular status) parties.

Well this just proves a pro-choice candidate can and should win the Senate seat in PA.  MO is WAY more pro-life than PA.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2006, 08:59:55 PM »



Well this just proves a pro-choice candidate can and should win the Senate seat in PA.  MO is WAY more pro-life than PA.

Uh, we've determined that a Pro Choice candidate can win a Senate seat in PA. Are you unaware that of the results of the 1980, 1986, 1992, 1998 and 2004 Senatorial elections here?
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2006, 09:01:09 PM »



Well this just proves a pro-choice candidate can and should win the Senate seat in PA.  MO is WAY more pro-life than PA.

Uh, we've determined that a Pro Choice candidate can win a Senate seat in PA. Are you unaware that of the results of the 1980, 1986, 1992, 1998 and 2004 Senatorial elections here?

Though I mentioned it, maybe this should be taken to the PA Senate thread.
Logged
Galactic Overlord
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 364


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2006, 09:11:50 PM »

Actually, I don't know if McCaskill's abortion stance came up very much in the Governor's race.  It certainly could be a liability in the Senate race.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2006, 03:17:50 AM »

The 3-point lead for McCaskill remains 100% consistent. Tongue

Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.