Should there have ever been any troops in Vietnam? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 09:14:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Should there have ever been any troops in Vietnam? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Should there have ever been any troops in Vietnam?  (Read 9534 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


« on: May 28, 2004, 05:44:15 AM »
I blame the French Wink
Seriously, LBJ shouldn't be blamed/demonised in the way he is... JFK was more responsible... and Eisenhower even more responsible... actually it *was* France's fault...


BTW does anyone else find BRTD's claim to be close to being a pacifist laughable?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2004, 03:33:33 AM »
Quote from: Better Red Than Dead on May 28, 2004, 07:12:16 PM
why? I haven't supported any wars since WWII.

You would have supported North Vietnam. You think that Che Guavara (a political thug) is a hero.
You are NOT a pacifist. You are degrading the word by saying that you are.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2004, 01:31:42 PM »
You are not even close to being a pacifist... unless the word means something else to you...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: May 30, 2004, 04:15:09 AM »
BRTD... you are not a pacifist. You are not even close to being one.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.