Lieberman (D) Leads Solidly in Connecticut (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:28:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  Lieberman (D) Leads Solidly in Connecticut (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Lieberman (D) Leads Solidly in Connecticut  (Read 4693 times)
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

« on: June 07, 2006, 04:08:08 PM »

The left wing "nuts" are the only true Democrats.  No finnicky wishy washy losers like Ben Nelson, Joe Lieberman, John Kerry, and John Edwards.  What this party needs is to stand up for its principles.  Rallying the liberal base, which has been disillusioned by the aforementioned people, is critical.  We need more people like Ned LaMont and Russell Feingold.  Men and women who stand up for the moral positions even if they are unpopular with so called "moderates."
Logged
jerusalemcar5
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,731
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -8.35

« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2006, 03:33:09 PM »

The left wing "nuts" are the only true Democrats.  No finnicky wishy washy losers like Ben Nelson, Joe Lieberman, John Kerry, and John Edwards. 
You may be right about Kerry and also Edwards (who in ideology aren't anywhere near the other two, so why the hell did you group them all into one category?) to a degree, but Lieberman and Nelson are anything but wishy washy and are especially not losers.  There pragmatism is of the uptmost values and is much more honorable than the endless, substanceless Bush-bashing of others.

Lieberman votes for/against things when they matter then switches to the other when it no longer matter.  Same for Nelson.  Regardless, they stray too far from the party and too close to Bush for being Democrats.  They are disgraces, but are not quite as bad as Zell Miller who was an ultra conservative Republican.  Saying that the Iraq war was a good deicision after everything we've seen is not honorable, it is despicable, especially for a "Democrat".  Substanceless Bush bashing?  Is this a joke?  How does calling him on the deficit, the war, his social policies, and his foreign policies become "substanceless."  I strongly disagree.  The real Democrats are honorably defending the country by rallying against the anti-constitution Bush.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.