agcatter
agcat
YaBB God
Posts: 3,740
|
 |
« on: January 19, 2004, 03:23:19 AM » |
|
gotta go with Miamiu on this one. Shouldn't make much difference one way or the other. I gotta believe that few people will flock to Clark on the basis of an endorsement of a former nominee who ran 32 years ago.
On the other hand, Michael Moore's endorsement will probably be a liability in a general election. His endorsement can't help with swing voters. it could probably hurt some among that group. Marginally, but hurting a little.
Of course I figured Harkin's endorsement of Dean in Iowa would be a boost to Dean and that doesn't seem to have been the case. At least, it doesn't seem that way now so what do I know.
|
