Rasmussen: Bingaman (D) looks safe against McCullough (R)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 03:15:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  Rasmussen: Bingaman (D) looks safe against McCullough (R)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rasmussen: Bingaman (D) looks safe against McCullough (R)  (Read 1122 times)
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,619
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 30, 2006, 03:17:31 PM »

New Poll: New Mexico Senator by Rasmussen on 2006-06-27

Summary: D: 59%, R: 33%, U: 0%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2006, 03:21:12 PM »

Interesting. Welcome to the forum mleflo1!  This must be the first poll I have seen out of NM.  Hopefully the combined force of Bingaman and Richardson's re-election margins will lift Patricia Madrid to victory over Heather Wilson. 
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 03, 2006, 01:50:34 PM »

Finally, a NM poll! Pretty much as expected...the only question is if Jeff will hit 60% or not.

And no, Madrid has too many ethics issues - and is too far left, frankly - to beat Wilson. Tongue
Logged
Adlai Stevenson
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,403
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2006, 04:09:21 PM »

That seems a shame, however, I guess you would know. Surely Bingaman would capture over 60% of the vote?  In 2000 he won by over 60% didn't he?
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,562


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2006, 04:29:07 PM »

That seems a shame, however, I guess you would know. Surely Bingaman would capture over 60% of the vote?  In 2000 he won by over 60% didn't he?
Hey, the Reps haven't held on to NM-1 since 1968 for nothing. Wink The Reps consistently pick decent moderates to run there, and the Dems...err, fail in one or both of those categories, also consistently. Or else they splinter. Or all three, as was the case in 1998. Feel free to peruse the blog I link to in my signature (no, it's not me, but it's the best NM Political Blog out there) for more information. Smiley

Oh, Bingaman might well do that, it's just that increasing polarization nationwide is seeping into the races here and might impact that. 2000 was a 62-38 victory (and 2002 Domenici won 65-35) so it's all quite possible.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 14 queries.