Why Joe Lieberman must be defeated

[jerusalemcar5]

That wasn't a half bad video.  I can't believe he supported the anti-constitution torture support Gonzales.  What a disgrace.  It only hardens my support for Ned Lamont.  If Lieberman pulls off a Connecticut primary win, it won't be that sad of a day for me.  Lieberman is a terrible Democrat, but he isn't a horrible Senator.  However, a Lamont primary win and finally I will see the Democratic backbone I've been looking for since 2000.  I'll be elated.

[jerusalemcar5]

I'm going to stop responding to your constant attacks, Progress.  You haven't been able to back up anything you say, but just persist in calling me a warmonger and telling me that I'm not a "true Democrat".  Come back and debate me when you have some facts, because your arguments thus far are somewhat pathetic.

Without using attacks I will try to explain something.  The democratic government will never be able to take control and neither will military or police forces.  All evidence supports that theory.  Iraq's arbitrary lines will cause the nation to collapse.  It just has to happen.  Our troops are too few to ever quell the resistance and so are theirs.  There is just no support to say that "sticking the course" will yield anythin, but more death.

[jerusalemcar5]

My posts in the past may have shown otherwise, but I just don't like vast left-wing conspiratists. 

Excuse me?  What are those?

Even though he's a staunch liberal, I still kinda like John Kerry

He is no staunch liberal, though Bush did play that card well.  He's intermediate Democrat (in between moderate and liberal), but he isn't that great.  He's basically a staunch panderer.  If you look at his Senate record before the 2004 election, you can see he was definitely not a liberal.