Fewest no of states for winner
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:17:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Fewest no of states for winner
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Fewest no of states for winner  (Read 2507 times)
acsenray
Rookie
**
Posts: 51


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: June 10, 2004, 04:14:43 PM »

Which president was elected with the fewest number of states in his column?
Logged
elcorazon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,402


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2004, 04:24:05 PM »

Adams?
Logged
zachman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,096


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2004, 05:04:56 PM »

Which president was elected with the fewest number of states in his column?
Good question. I think elcorazon is probably right with Adams. I think for our purposes we should look at it as the lowest percentage in the last century. Since this both Kennedy and Carter won with 23/51 . Gore won 21 last time and could have made it with 22/51.

Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2004, 05:39:27 PM »

Adams
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2004, 05:47:18 PM »

It is Adams. John Q. Adams won the majority in only 6 states (all New England) but won the election due to a vote in the House.

Logged
Lunar
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,404
Ireland, Republic of
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2004, 06:48:48 PM »
« Edited: June 10, 2004, 06:50:25 PM by Lunar »

Not really fair to look back that far.
Logged
PBrunsel
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,537


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2004, 06:56:53 PM »

Not really fair to look back that far.

I guess the next is Carter in 1976 or Kennedy in 1960.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2004, 06:57:30 PM »

It might be better to calculate the lowest percentage of states so the elections in the 1800s can be taken into consideration.
Logged
Fmr. Gov. NickG
NickG
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,191


Political Matrix
E: -8.00, S: -3.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2004, 11:36:02 PM »

Which president was elected with the fewest number of states in his column?
Good question. I think elcorazon is probably right with Adams. I think for our purposes we should look at it as the lowest percentage in the last century. Since this both Kennedy and Carter won with 23/51 . Gore won 21 last time and could have made it with 22/51.



If you're looking for close calls, I think Charles Hughes could have won with 19/48 states in 1916 by flipping <0.2% in California... this would be 39.6% of states.  

Kennedy and Carter won 45.1%.
Gore would have won 43.1% had he won FL.

I'm not sure any other president has won with a minority of states, excluding the elections before there was a populat vote.
Logged
Fritz
JLD
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,668
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2004, 12:39:40 AM »

Kennedy won 22/50, not 23/51.  This was before DC had electoral votes.  So Kennedy had 44%.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 12 queries.