26 Former U.S. Officials Oppose Bush (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 04:33:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
  26 Former U.S. Officials Oppose Bush (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 26 Former U.S. Officials Oppose Bush  (Read 6363 times)
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

« on: June 13, 2004, 10:17:41 PM »

The real experts are the American people.  These 100 just equal 100 votes in their respective states.


Yeah, who cares if 26 experts say that the Bush admin has done a poor job.  If you've had the Kool-Aid nothing matters, right?

I could find 100 "experts" to say Bush is doing a good job. What's your point?

And yet these 100 have not come forward.  These are real experts.  Retired Generals, a former head of the CIA, ambassadors to the Soviet Union, Israel, Saudi Arabia.  You aren't going to find people with those kind of credentials.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2004, 10:18:43 PM »

Hmm.. thats interesting.  I care a lot more about what Jim the Janitor thinks.  He's the one who has to live with the policies.  The CIA directors and other elitists make so much money they don't care who becomes President.

Won't matter unless the election is decided by 26 votes.

True, but I have to believe that a former director of the CIA has better clue when it comes to foreign policy and national security than Jim the Janitor who voted for Bush.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2004, 10:25:27 PM »

I'm with the Janitor...

But who is more qualified to make statements about foreign policy?  A janitor or a CIA director?
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2004, 10:31:19 PM »

News Flash -- Democrats don't care what working class Americans think.

Oh, wait... that's old news.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2004, 10:31:52 PM »

I think he ought to forget about these numbnuts and come up with around 55-60 million experts in November Smiley

Like was stated earlier, the Bush campaign can go out and round up their own "expert" list.  So what?  

Bush should come out with a list of, say, 27 experts.
Logged
Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,983
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2004, 10:40:23 PM »

I'm glad you have the money to afford all of those things.... No wonder you have no respect for janitors.

If I want advice on National Security, I'll go to the people who have the responsibility to handle the situation at present, not hack jobs from the past.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 15 queries.