which presidential candidate was weaker? (user search)

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 27, 2024, 07:37:38 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Discussion

History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)

which presidential candidate was weaker? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

....

#1 mondale in 84		17 (40.5%)
#2 dukakis in 88		23 (54.8%)
#3 dole in 96		2 (4.8%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 42

Author

Topic: which presidential candidate was weaker? (Read 7393 times)

© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 36,562

Re: which presidential candidate was weaker?

« on: September 04, 2006, 01:15:29 PM »

Dukakis, because 1988 was a winnable race. 1984 and 1996 weren't really competitive.

Logged

© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar

Posts: 36,562

Re: which presidential candidate was weaker?

« Reply #1 on: September 21, 2006, 07:28:25 PM »

Quote from: Brutus on September 21, 2006, 07:14:49 PM

Dukakis was like a preview of John Kerry. Both dull north-easterners that put you to sleep when they talked. Ultimately, Dukakis was done in by Bush's false promise: "Read my lips, no new taxes."

No, he was done in by the "if your wife was raped" question, Willie Horton, and the tank.

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 11 queries.