which presidential candidate was weaker? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:43:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  which presidential candidate was weaker? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ....
#1
mondale in 84		  
#2
dukakis in 88		  
#3
dole in 96		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 42

Author Topic: which presidential candidate was weaker?  (Read 7410 times)
Max
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 276
« on: October 04, 2006, 02:12:38 AM »
Quote from: Joel on September 09, 2006, 08:43:05 AM
Walter Mondale and Bob Dole were experienced politicians, having spent a life in Washington.  Mike Dukakis was an ultra-liberal from my state who was weak on crime.  The previous statement may not be true, but the fact that he let himself be portrayed as that shows his weakness as a candidate.

Dukakis was a DLC-guy and very pragmatic.
Logged
Max
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 276
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2006, 01:12:13 AM »
Quote from: Tredrick on October 04, 2006, 11:15:12 AM
Quote from: Max on October 04, 2006, 02:12:38 AM

Dukakis was a DLC-guy and very pragmatic.

Reality called.  She wants a divorce. 

You, apparently, have already begun the paperwork.

You know, that's what I read about him and what most people told me about him.

But of course, for some people everyone who is to the left of Reagan is seen as an "ultra-liberal".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 14 queries.