He said the site will give religious Democrats "the moral support and some language they can use."
You can’t fool people into believing you stand for Christian principles if you continuously:
1) mock Faith-Based Initiatives while forcing people, through taxes, to provide for the faceless poor (by faceless I mean poor people that you can’t witness their circumstances to ensure they’re not ripping you off)…instead of it being an act of charity. Jesus never forced people to provide for the poor, rather he appealed to their hearts and left it up to the individual’s free will. Also, the New Testament gives this rule “if a man is not willing to work, he will not eat”.While you are obviously entirely ignorant of how the economic heirarchy under which you labour works, worker, you are also filled with the most ridiculous hubris! Pathetic. Are you not aware that there is a large class which does not work, who 'eat' the cream of society's production? These are the owners, you poor irrational creature, and everything is done for them.
They are technically parasites, jmfcst - certainly more so than the poor you pillory.
Your use of the term 'respectable', is a step in the right direction and I applaud you for it. After all there are so few glimmers of reason in the mind of a religious such as yourself. 'Respectability' implies popularity, as in the majority of people, or at least the people who matter, in society approve. This is very different from your usual laughable 'objective morality' claims.
