PA: Temple Univ./Philly Inquirer: Rendell (D) leads Swann (R) by a wide margin (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:31:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  PA: Temple Univ./Philly Inquirer: Rendell (D) leads Swann (R) by a wide margin (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA: Temple Univ./Philly Inquirer: Rendell (D) leads Swann (R) by a wide margin  (Read 1165 times)
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« on: September 24, 2006, 10:36:36 AM »

by Temple University and the Philadelphia Inquirer which was not in the list.

My university is dead wrong with Rendell hitting 60%.  Tongue  I post this as I wear a Temple t-shirt, too.

In all seriousness, Rendell won't get to 60% but probably close to it.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2006, 09:09:13 PM »

I think Rendell will end up winning 56-44 or so.

That's exactly what I'd say for the race right now.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2006, 09:21:51 PM »

I think Rendell will end up winning 56-44 or so.

That's exactly what I'd say for the race right now.

And that is bad news for Santorum.

Pretty pathetic that you feel the need to stop by to say that you think he is in trouble.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2006, 09:23:37 PM »

I think Rendell will end up winning 56-44 or so.

That's exactly what I'd say for the race right now.

And that is bad news for Santorum.

Pretty pathetic that you feel the need to stop by to say that you think he is in trouble.

It's not what i think it is a fact that he is in trouble.

Ok so why do you feel the need to come back out of no where just to get on Santorum's case?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2006, 09:30:30 PM »

[quote author=DarthKosh link=topic=45764.msg1001110#msg1001110
Not really.  I was just reading the boards and felt like commenting.  I did not know there was a rule against that.
[/quote]

If you were more frequent in your forum usage you'd know that any negative comments concerning Santorum were abolished months ago.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.