1980: Kennedy/Udall VS Dole/Laxalt
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:29:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  1980: Kennedy/Udall VS Dole/Laxalt
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: 1980: Ted Kennedy/Morris Udall VS Bob Dole/Paul Laxalt
#1
Kennedy/Kennedy
#2
Dole/Dole
#3
Kennedy/Dole
#4
Dole/Kennedy
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: 1980: Kennedy/Udall VS Dole/Laxalt  (Read 1585 times)
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,435
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 05, 2006, 07:59:35 PM »

Chappaquidick doesn't happen, so Ted Kennedy wins the Democratic Party's nomination for Presidident after a long bitter primary fight against incumbant Jimmy Carter and Senator Henry Jackson. Kennedy chooses Arizona Representative, Morris "Mo" Udall for the VP slot. Both candidates are Charismatic and Udall posesses a witty sense of humor, which Kennedy feels will help the ticket on the campaign.

The Republicans had sensed victory with the ineffective Carter in office, but the Democrats had repudiated the administration, and offered forward the charismatic Kennedy and the popular Udall who offer a different vision apart from Carter. The Republicans, believing that they can still scapegoat Carter, nominate Kansas Senator Bob Dole, the Vice-Presidential candidate of 1976, after Ronald Regan refuses to be considered for the Veep slot, so Nevada Senator Paul Laxalt, an intelligent campaigner, is tapped for the spot.

The campaign is a lively affair as the Republicans, without as dynamic a ticket as the Democrats, focus on Carter's ineffectualness. The Democrats denouce the Administration as well, and offer to take the nation in a more positive direction.

Who do you vote for and who wins? Maps?
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 06, 2006, 10:27:15 AM »
« Edited: October 06, 2006, 11:12:55 AM by Winfield »

1980 was a bad year for any Democratic Presidential nominee.  Udall goes over better than Kennedy on the campaign trail.

Although Kennedy and Udall try to distance themselves from the failed Carter administration, Dole and Laxalt go on the attack, which they could do very well, and make sure the voters believe that with Kennedy they will only get more of the same.     

Dole and Laxalt campaign on restoring a healthy economy, bringing inflation under control, and restoring America's prestige abroad. 

Campaigning in behalf of Dole by Ronald Reagan in California helps deliver California to Dole and Laxalt.

Dole/Laxalt               327
Kennedy/Udall          211



Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,833
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 06, 2006, 01:12:25 PM »

If it weren't for Chappaquidick, Kennedy would have probably ran for president sometime before 1980.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderators
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 06, 2006, 09:55:41 PM »

If it weren't for Chappaquidick, Kennedy would have probably ran for president sometime before 1980.
'76
Logged
TomC
TCash101
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,976


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2006, 12:33:43 AM »

Ugh! What a boring race. I'm sorry; I just can't see Dole winning.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2006, 05:00:24 AM »

Without Chappaquiddick, Kennedy is a very dangerous political adversary.

Dole is steady and dependale... no doubt, but how does he match Kennedy - name, charisma?
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,435
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2006, 11:58:07 AM »

I think the only way Kennedy wins nomination realistically is without Chappaquidick. And, without that, that makes him far more of a political asset. He had charisma, and the Kennedy name... Even in this scenario, he made a politically ingenious move by selecting the best possible candidate in the witty Mo Udall...

I think Dole would put up a fight, and Laxalt is a big help, it's close, but I see Kennedy taking every northeastern state, as well as a majority of the industrial midwest, especially the important state of Illinois.... Enough to swing the election his way.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 13 queries.