Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:39:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Pennsylvania: Casey would have to say macaca to lose now (rasmussen)  (Read 32012 times)
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
« on: October 09, 2006, 09:56:19 PM »

I don't see any evidence that Pennsylvania polls are biased in favor of Democrats. Looking at the final five 2004 polls in PA:

2004-11-01 Survey USA K +1 48% 49% 1% 2% 4% 657 L 0
2004-10-31 Quinnipiac University Tie 47% 47% 0% 6% 3% 1,022 L 0
2004-10-31 Gallup B +4 50% 46% 0% 4% 3% 1,082 L 0
2004-10-29 Mason-Dixon K +2 46% 48% 0% 6% 4% 625 L 0
2004-10-27 Strategic Vision Tie 48% 48% 0% 4% 3% 801 L 0

All underestimated Kerry's margin of victory. The last poll to overestimate Kerry's lead was West Chester University on 10-27 (a Uni poll....)

So I guess I'm not seeing where this idea that Dems overpoll in PA is coming from, at least based on the last election.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 15 queries.