1924, John Davis and the KKK?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 11:46:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1924, John Davis and the KKK?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1924, John Davis and the KKK?  (Read 2042 times)
TommyC1776
KucinichforPrez
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,162


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: October 13, 2006, 10:48:30 PM »

How come John Davis got the Southern vote when he opposed the KKK?
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2006, 01:31:53 PM »

How come John Davis got the Southern vote when he opposed the KKK?

He wasn't a Republican or a Catholic.
Logged
TommyC1776
KucinichforPrez
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,162


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2006, 09:15:51 PM »

How come John Davis got the Southern vote when he opposed the KKK?

He wasn't a Republican or a Catholic.

o. ok.  so the South still supported a candidate who was against the KKK?  How could that be?  That doesn't sound right.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2006, 11:26:58 PM »

How come John Davis got the Southern vote when he opposed the KKK?

He wasn't a Republican or a Catholic.

o. ok.  so the South still supported a candidate who was against the KKK?  How could that be?  That doesn't sound right.

In those days, the south supported the Democrats, overwhelmingly.  Go back and look at the election results from 1900 onwards, even before 1900.  The south was not called the "Solid South" for the Democrats for nothing.  Look at the overwhelming margins most southern states gave to the Democratic nominees, even when the Republicans had a popular candidate who was cleaning up everywhere else.

No Democratic candidate was FOR the KKK.  That's ridiculous.
Logged
TommyC1776
KucinichforPrez
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,162


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2006, 12:19:15 PM »

How come John Davis got the Southern vote when he opposed the KKK?

He wasn't a Republican or a Catholic.

o. ok.  so the South still supported a candidate who was against the KKK?  How could that be?  That doesn't sound right.

In those days, the south supported the Democrats, overwhelmingly.  Go back and look at the election results from 1900 onwards, even before 1900.  The south was not called the "Solid South" for the Democrats for nothing.  Look at the overwhelming margins most southern states gave to the Democratic nominees, even when the Republicans had a popular candidate who was cleaning up everywhere else.

No Democratic candidate was FOR the KKK.  That's ridiculous.

o. ok.  idk that no Dem candidate liked the KKK.  I know they always had the South behind them.  But Truman was the first President to make the margin of victories in the South smaller right bc of his Civil Rights platform?  I have to say, that Grant got a few Southern states and so did Hayes. (who wasn't that well known.......as far as I know.)
Logged
True Democrat
true democrat
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,368
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2006, 12:39:07 PM »

How come John Davis got the Southern vote when he opposed the KKK?

He wasn't a Republican or a Catholic.

o. ok.  so the South still supported a candidate who was against the KKK?  How could that be?  That doesn't sound right.

In those days, the south supported the Democrats, overwhelmingly.  Go back and look at the election results from 1900 onwards, even before 1900.  The south was not called the "Solid South" for the Democrats for nothing.  Look at the overwhelming margins most southern states gave to the Democratic nominees, even when the Republicans had a popular candidate who was cleaning up everywhere else.

No Democratic candidate was FOR the KKK.  That's ridiculous.

o. ok.  idk that no Dem candidate liked the KKK.  I know they always had the South behind them.  But Truman was the first President to make the margin of victories in the South smaller right bc of his Civil Rights platform?  I have to say, that Grant got a few Southern states and so did Hayes. (who wasn't that well known.......as far as I know.)

Actually, you can see that the collapse of the Democrats in the South in 1948 can actually be traced back to 1944.  Roosevelt's votes declined a lot.  Also, look at SC and TX.  Things that are similar to unpledged electors got a large amount of the vote.
Logged
gorkay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 995


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: October 27, 2006, 03:05:05 PM »

The only reason that Grant and Hayes got southern electoral votes was that they were in states that were still under Reconstruction and had severely curtailed voting rights for many citizens.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 11 queries.