Connecticut: Lamont seems done to me (ARG) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:31:06 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2006 Elections
  2006 Senatorial Election Polls
  Connecticut: Lamont seems done to me (ARG) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Connecticut: Lamont seems done to me (ARG)  (Read 2642 times)
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,557


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

« on: October 23, 2006, 04:43:11 PM »

Lamont needs to do a better job of pointing out where most of Leibermans support is coming from.
10/20/06   Lamont   Lieberman   Others*   Undecided
Likely voters   37%   49%   9%   5%
Republicans (28%)   8%   66%   23%   3%
Democrats (39%)   62%   34%   0%   4%
Unaffiliated (33%)   33%   53%   8%   6%

Tongue
Logged
WMS
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,557


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -1.22

« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2006, 05:06:19 PM »

Lamont needs to do a better job of pointing out where most of Leibermans support is coming from.
10/20/06   Lamont   Lieberman   Others*   Undecided
Likely voters   37%   49%   9%   5%
Republicans (28%)   8%   66%   23%   3%
Democrats (39%)   62%   34%   0%   4%
Unaffiliated (33%)   33%   53%   8%   6%

Tongue

Lieberman's support (according to this poll): 18.5% Republicans, Democrats 13.25%, Independents 17.5%. In other words, about 37% of Lieberman voters are Republicans, 35% Independents and 27% Democrats.

Yep. I said after the primary that the Independent vote would decide this race, and Lamont's failure to win them over, despite Indys being almost as anti-war as Dems, pretty much ends his chances.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.