New Tradesports rankings (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 12:04:23 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  New Tradesports rankings (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
Author Topic: New Tradesports rankings  (Read 182813 times)
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« on: December 11, 2006, 11:51:00 AM »

He's at 19, Hillary is 53...what kind of surge is that?

A pretty decent one (considering where he was before).
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2006, 08:34:59 PM »

He's at 19, Hillary is 53...what kind of surge is that?

He seems to be hurting Gore, and to a lesser extent Edwards more than Hillary.

He scooped up Warner's spot as the infamous "Anti-Hillary".
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2007, 11:26:22 PM »

Good. Clinton continues to fall.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2007, 12:35:11 AM »

Obama has now reached a new all time high of 23.8.  His price is finally more than half that of Clinton's.


Sweet (not that it really means anything).
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2007, 06:43:07 PM »

How is Gore still getting 9.0?
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2007, 04:57:42 PM »

What is it with Gore thing?
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2007, 05:13:28 PM »


Well I guess you don't find Giuliani's numbers impressive either right?
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #7 on: February 26, 2007, 07:51:34 PM »

Winning individual
Clinton 29.2
Giuliani 17.6
McCain 15.5
Obama 15.0
Romney 9.5
Edwards 8.1
Gore 5.9
Allen 1.1
Warner 1.0


9.5 for Romney and 1.1 for Allen. Wow.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2007, 04:25:07 PM »

You would think Obama would be a little higher by now and McCain would be a little lower.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #9 on: March 02, 2007, 06:11:04 PM »

Hillary is tanking
Obama hit a record high of 25.0 earlier
Giuliani hits a new record high
Gingrich and Hunter surge

Democrats
Clinton 45.0
Obama 24.9
Gore 11.9
Edwards 9.5
Richardson 2.7
Biden 1.6
Clark 0.5
Warner 0.5
Dodd 0.3
Feingold 0.2
Kerry 0.2
Bayh 0.1
Vilsack 0.1




Republicans
Giuliani 33.8
McCain 30.5
Romney 16.0
Gingrich 8.0
Huckabee 6.4
Hagel 4.3
Brownback 2.5
Rice 1.5
Hunter 1.4
Cheney 0.6
Bloomberg 0.5
Bush 0.4
Powell 0.2
Thompson 0.2
Tancredo 0.2
Owens 0.1
Paul 0.1

Thats more like it.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2007, 12:47:29 AM »

Obama is now at a record high of 27.0.

Clinton, Gore and Edwards are all down.

Richardson is up to 3.1.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2007, 12:54:29 AM »

Obama is surging tonight. He is up to 30.0.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #12 on: March 07, 2007, 08:37:26 PM »

Damn Giuliani is really getting up there.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #13 on: March 07, 2007, 11:20:27 PM »

I predict that Romney will pass McCain within the next three weeks, at most.

Maybe if  he stops barely polling outside of the margin of error.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #14 on: March 08, 2007, 04:18:01 PM »

I only wish Clinton started tanking a little later in the year. I don't want her to have a chance to firmly regain her footing.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #15 on: March 19, 2007, 07:15:36 PM »


...because he has no chance?
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #16 on: March 22, 2007, 11:40:06 AM »


I wouldn't totally mind being wrong. I like the guy.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #17 on: March 22, 2007, 12:52:53 PM »

I wouldn't expect him to reach 8.8 again any time soon.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #18 on: March 23, 2007, 02:19:46 PM »

I still can't believe Gore is so high.

A lot of peons think he will try to swoop into Edwards spot.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #19 on: March 26, 2007, 07:15:12 PM »

Look for Thompson to fly over Romney soon.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #20 on: March 28, 2007, 03:14:14 PM »

Don't care for the Clinton rise.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2007, 10:40:58 PM »

Update: And Thompson has now in fact reached 17.0 and surpassed Romney.  At this rate, how long before he surpasses McCain?

They've also added Thompson to the list of VP choices.  Currently the Ask is 20 and the Bid is 5.


Imagine what he'll be up to when he announces.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #22 on: April 25, 2007, 08:51:47 PM »

So "Hillary is far, far more right wing than Edwards and Obama"?

LOL.  Uh, I'm very familiar with her Senate voting record.  It's the same as Edwards (slightly more lefty in fact than his was) and no different than Obama since he entered the Senate. 

Look it up.

Hillary is pro-war, those two are not. Plus she served on the board of directors for WAL-MART. She is no liberal.

Incorrect.  Hillary Clinton is anti-war.

In what way?
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #23 on: April 25, 2007, 09:23:14 PM »
« Edited: April 25, 2007, 09:25:03 PM by Eraserhead »

So "Hillary is far, far more right wing than Edwards and Obama"?

LOL.  Uh, I'm very familiar with her Senate voting record.  It's the same as Edwards (slightly more lefty in fact than his was) and no different than Obama since he entered the Senate. 

Look it up.

Hillary is pro-war, those two are not. Plus she served on the board of directors for WAL-MART. She is no liberal.

Incorrect.  Hillary Clinton is anti-war.

In what way?

As in she'll withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq if elected President? I don't think Nixonian is an apt analogy either; she's not promising "peace with honor" or being intentionally vague. Hillary has made it quite clear that she'll initiate a rapid withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq if elected President.

Honestly, how is her position on Iraq any different from any other Democratic candidate? They'll all do the same thing if elected. It's all about finding the most electable candidate at this point.

She still believes going to war was a good idea though. So she still gets a pro-war label and deserves nothing less.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,479
United States


« Reply #24 on: May 08, 2007, 02:28:06 AM »

Thompson bombed in his first major speech since the Presidential talk got serious. I think my original idea that his candidacy was a complete joke may not have been far off.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 13 queries.