States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 11:35:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: States which are the least likely to have all their counties go to one candidate  (Read 7876 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« on: December 16, 2006, 03:31:49 PM »

NJ, Hudson and Sussex would never switch there too hyperpartisan

Hudson voted for Reagan in 1984 (Essex voted for Mondale) and for Nixon in 1972. (Nixon swept NJ.) Sussex voted for Johnson in 1964. (Johnson swept NJ.)
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2006, 07:31:19 AM »
« Edited: December 21, 2006, 07:32:58 AM by Verily »

VT, Mass, NH, CT and RI are the only states that come to mind that lack that kind or diversity.

There's also Utah, Wyoming, and Nebraska, both of which frequently have all their counties won by the Republican.

And Hawaii to Democrats. Nevada can be swept by Republicans in a strong year for them. (It happened every election 1980-1988.)

Also, the last time NH was swept was 1988, by a Republican.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.