Zogby (uh oh): Edwards leads in Iowa.

[Eraserhead]

Of course its Zogby, so take it with a grain of salt....although this would fit with most of what we have heard about Iowa.



http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1236

Edwards: 27%
Obama: 17%
Vilsack: 16%
Clinton: 16%

[Eraserhead]

This has not been a good week for Shillary

It really hasn't (which means it was a pretty good week for me).

[Eraserhead]

Hillary may not be leading in Iowa, but she IS leading just about everywhere else.  I mean, one state and everyone's cheering.  Democrats still have a lot of work if they want to take her out, and I don't think they can do it.  With as a long a history as they have of nominating the worst possible candidate, I don't see them correcting those mistakes anytime soon.....

It'll prove my point if either Hillary or Obama win the nomination.

After Iowa, Kerry essentially won the nomination. You shouldn't underestimate its importance. Also Obama would be a great candidate.

[Eraserhead]

Also Obama would be a great candidate.

I actually like Obama, although it's more than a little obvious that the media has a liberal bias, and he is their candidate.  The thing is, a majority of the country simply will not vote for a black man with a name that sounds like Osama and also reminds them of a certain Iraqi dictator.  I know that sounds shallow, but it's true.  The majority of this country will reject him as soon as they learn more about him.  Your party would be better off with someone like Edwards, Richardson, Clark, Gore, Bayh, Warner, etc, etc.  The fact that the two candidates in the lead right now for the primary (a very controversial female with limited experience who moved to a liberal state just because she knew she'd never get elected in her home state; a black man who'll make every single voter in America think of a guy wearing a turban and flying a plane into the WTC) will end up having some of the worst chances of actually winning in the general election.

And I like Obama.  I'm just saying...

Well I couldn't disagree more but to each his own.