2006 Election Irregularities

[TeePee4Prez]

i just find it funny that the party who gets the greatest percent of dead people's votes are complaining about electoral fraud.

Woohoo, bringing up issues from the 1960s. It doesn't fly.

You are seriously very, very naive if you think that that doesn't happen today. Verily, meet major American cities...

Right. There have been no recorded incidents of dead voters intentionally registered since the early 1970s, but don't worry, it still happens.

Haha. Wow. You think because there have been no recorded incidents that it doesn't happen and then you get smart with me. Fantasy Land must be lovely this time of year...

When you have evidence, call me. Until then, your accusations of naivete are nothing more than hot air.

How many people live in your small town Fantasy Land, Verily? Are you familiar with Philadelphia? Are you familiar with other big cities? Are you really that foolish to believe that this problem just happened to disappear after the 70s?

Philadelphia is a Democratic city like most others- Chicago, NYC, Detroit, Boston, etc.  You lost PA in 2004.  You lost bigtime in 2006.  Please stop whining Phil, the GOP has most of the country.  Be happy that in order for the Democrats to have won in 2006, we had to select much more conservative nominees than what I or many others would prefer.  We had to play right into the Religious Right's hands by nominating Bob Casey.  In esscence you guys are still winning yet you'll never be happy.  The so-called "Neighborhood Civic PAC" which supposedly addresses this fake "voter fraud" is a GOP-fronted joke that seems to like to whine about living in a Democratic city.  It's blatantly obvious from looking at their website.  Look, Northeast Philly, South Philly, Manayunk/Roxborough, and parts of Center City almost unanimously voted for Sam Katz(R) and the votes were rightfully counted for him, weren't they Phil? I will say there need to be some new leaders in Philadelphia, BUT that will have no effect on how the results will be in national/state races.  Katz got those votes by being a liberal Republican.  A lot of us even in the more (relatively)conservative parts of Philly are still not as conservative as the national party.  Hell, if the entire poltical realm were the city of Philadelphia, I'd likely be a Republican too, but it's not. 

[TeePee4Prez]

Philadelphia is a Democratic city like most others- Chicago, NYC, Detroit, Boston, etc.  You lost PA in 2004.  You lost bigtime in 2006.  Please stop whining Phil, the GOP has most of the country.

How is that even remotely related to what I said about dead voting in major cities? How is that whining?

 

You must be logged in to read this quote.

It is really amazing how you stretch every last thing so you can connect it to some rant about local politics. How does catering to the right wing with the selection of candidates mean that dead voting doesn't occur? Can you finally admit that you just like to rant about stupid things?

You then make some loose connection with a local group which is absolutely laughable. I'd love to respect your arguments, Flyers, but you make it so easy to dismiss all of your points. Take a hint - don't make everything about the evil right wing and then we can have a real conversation.

Do me a favor and stop bringing up a race where votes were properly counted in certain areas to mean that other irregularities didn't happen. You're a cheap hack. You need to make everything about some conservative conspiracy and it's really old. Stay on the topic of dead voters or do us both a favor and don't waste your time posting.

What conspiracy? 

I am addressing the topic of "dead voters."  You keep saying or strongly hinting to the fact that the Republicans would have won PA if it were not for this because of this "dead voter" phenomenon.  If anyone's getting into the conspiracy theories, its you, not me.  I rightfully bring up the Neighborhood Civic PAC because they are by and large the purveyors of these strongly GOP-slanted theories and you know it.