What is criterion #3? Let me guess, "The above criteria shall not be construed as to apply to any Democrat"?
Oh, here it is:
So if we limit this criterion to apply only to the Iraq war, and if we only consider statements Edwards has made in the last six months while campaigning for president, then maybe he does fail the test.
However, Edwards did not just vote for the resolution authorizing the Iraq war, he cosponsored it. In fact, Edwards pushed for war before Bush even went to Congress to get the resolution.
From an Edwards press release:
Edwards was so pro-war that he tried to one-up Bush by declaring that he drove the country to a showdown with Saddam before Bush did!
Then there is the case of Edwards' record during the Clinton years.
From an Edwards press release dated 3 May 1999:
Sounds to me like Edwards felt that war was the preferred solution here, too. I don't recall him asking Clinton to find a diplomatic solution in the Balkans before the bombing started.
From the same release:
So is your defense of Edwards that he didn’t say the troops were doing a “glorious” job, just a “fine” one?
Face it, the average North Carolinian (or average American, for that matter) doesn’t share your views on war. John Edwards pushed for war because he thought it would win him votes. John Edwards glorified the Kosovo war, portraying it as a good vs. evil issue, to win votes. Now Edwards has adopted a six month-old skepticism of war in hopes of winning votes.
Sorry, looks like your anti-Cheney venom has come back to haunt you.