Quinnipiac Poll: Bunch of Results for General Election

[Reaganfan]

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1284.xml?ReleaseID=1019&What=&strArea=;&strTime=0

Giuliani: 48%
Clinton: 43%

Giuliani: 47%
Obama: 40%

Giuliani: 48%
Edwards: 40%

McCain: 46%
Clinton: 44%

McCain: 43%
Obama: 43%

McCain: 43%
Edwards: 43%

Clinton: 49%
Romney: 37%

Edwards: 48%
Romney: 32%

Obama: 49%
Romney: 29%

Key findings: "Giuliani tops Clinton 55% to 38% in Red states, which voted Republican in the 2004 presidential election, and ties her 46% to 46% in Blue states, which went Democratic in 2004. He gets 44% to Clinton's 45% in Purple states, where the margin in 2004 was less than 7%."

Said pollster Maurice Carroll: "When we look at the Red, Blue and Purple state matchups, we see Giuliani running strong in any color, while Sen. Clinton outpoints Sen. McCain in Blue and Purple states. Sen. Obama and John Edwards are in the middle somewhere and Mitt Romney is nowhere, actually losing to Obama and Edwards in Red states, where voters probably just don't know the former Massachusetts governor."

[© tweed]

Giuliani's strong.

But public opinion of him has absolutely nowhere to go but straight down.

[Tender Branson]

Key findings: "Giuliani tops Clinton 55% to 38% in Red states, which voted Republican in the 2004 presidential election, and ties her 46% to 46% in Blue states, which went Democratic in 2004. He gets 44% to Clinton's 45% in Purple states, where the margin in 2004 was less than 7%."

Hmm. I wonder if they have state polls for "Purple States", "Blue States" and "Red States" or do they just split the 1.400 polled by state, like 2 people from Wyoming + 11 people from Nevada etc... or do they have seperate state samples of 500 + or whatever ?

[Small Business Owner of Any Repute]

Assuming the MOE given for the entire poll, breaking down the poll by individual state would give statistically useless data.

Key findings: "Giuliani tops Clinton 55% to 38% in Red states, which voted Republican in the 2004 presidential election, and ties her 46% to 46% in Blue states, which went Democratic in 2004. He gets 44% to Clinton's 45% in Purple states, where the margin in 2004 was less than 7%."

Hmm. I wonder if they have state polls for "Purple States", "Blue States" and "Red States" or do they just split the 1.400 polled by state, like 2 people from Wyoming + 11 people from Nevada etc... or do they have seperate state samples of 500 + or whatever ?

[CARLHAYDEN]

Giuliani's strong.

But public opinion of him has absolutely nowhere to go but straight down.

Guiliani's candidacy is like a souffle. 

[Inmate Trump]

Giuliani's strong.

But public opinion of him has absolutely nowhere to go but straight down.

Guiliani's candidacy is like a souffle. 

Really, really good?  I love sweet potato souffle.  Especially with the nutty-crumbly topping. 

[CARLHAYDEN]

Giuliani's strong.

But public opinion of him has absolutely nowhere to go but straight down.

Guiliani's candidacy is like a souffle. 

Really, really good?  I love sweet potato souffle.  Especially with the nutty-crumbly topping. 

I personally prefer sweet potato pie (I first tried it in a picnic in South Carolina many years ago). 

But, yes, the Giuliani candidacy is filled with nuts.

[Inmate Trump]

I personally prefer sweet potato pie (I first tried it in a picnic in South Carolina many years ago). 

But, yes, the Giuliani candidacy is filled with nuts.

Sweet potato pie's good too.

Are Giuliani's nuts on top of (or in) a souffle? 

[CARLHAYDEN]

I personally prefer sweet potato pie (I first tried it in a picnic in South Carolina many years ago). 

But, yes, the Giuliani candidacy is filled with nuts.

Sweet potato pie's good too.

Are Giuliani's nuts on top of (or in) a souffle? 

While many agree that Giuliani is nuts, most also concur that despite his public blustering, he really doesn't have any.

[Eraserhead]

Obama '08.

[Inmate Trump]

Obama '08.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Best Democrat  against:

Giuliani: Clinton
McCain: Obama and Edwards
Romney: Obama