SCOTUS Opinion Poll 3: Justice Antonin Scalia
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 10:36:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  SCOTUS Opinion Poll 3: Justice Antonin Scalia		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...
#1
Strongly approve		  
#2
Approve		  
#3
Neutral		  
#4
Disapprove		  
#5
Strongly disapprove		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 20

Author Topic: SCOTUS Opinion Poll 3: Justice Antonin Scalia  (Read 2800 times)
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: September 17, 2008, 05:17:34 PM »
Vote!
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,178
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2008, 10:14:53 PM »
     Merely approve. I don't agree with his judicial philosophy as much as I do with Thomas's.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2008, 10:26:32 PM »
Over the top sometimes, but incredibly brilliant.  Definitely makes reading USSC opinions worthwhile.

Strongly Approve.
Logged
Daniel Adams
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,424
Georgia


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: 2.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2008, 11:44:19 PM »
Quote from: PiT (The Physicist) on September 17, 2008, 10:14:53 PM
     Merely approve. I don't agree with his judicial philosophy as much as I do with Thomas's.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,435
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2008, 02:25:22 AM »
Disapprove because I disagree strongly with his judicial philosophy, but I greatly respect his legal acumen (as conservatives had to do in William J. Brennan's case)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.209 seconds with 14 queries.