Louisiana Supreme Court upholds death penalty for rape of an 8-year-old girl
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 09:39:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: World politics is up Schmitt creek)
  Louisiana Supreme Court upholds death penalty for rape of an 8-year-old girl
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Louisiana Supreme Court upholds death penalty for rape of an 8-year-old girl  (Read 16712 times)
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 23, 2007, 02:44:31 PM »
« edited: May 23, 2007, 02:57:04 PM by A18 »

Or did, yesterday, in State v. Kennedy. On the issue of Corker v. Georgia: "while Coker clearly bars the use of the death penalty as punishment for the rape of an adult woman, it left open the question of which, if any, non-homicide crimes can be constitutionally punished by death."

Discuss.

I expect the Supreme Court to grant review.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2007, 05:15:04 PM »

I agree and expect reversal by a 5-4 margin with Kennedy holding the deciding vote.

He's been leaning slightly more to the left on death penalty issues for the last few years.
Logged
DWPerry
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674
Puerto Rico


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 23, 2007, 10:26:55 PM »

It should be upheld; I for one, think that the death penalty should be mandatory for anyone committing a felony while serving a life-sentence. (yes, it's possible)
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2007, 04:43:41 AM »

It should be upheld; I for one, think that the death penalty should be mandatory for anyone committing a felony while serving a life-sentence. (yes, it's possible)

Cocaine posession is a felony in some states.  Would you kill prisoners on drugs?
Logged
DWPerry
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674
Puerto Rico


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2007, 02:10:03 AM »

I was thinking more along the lines of Assaulting another inmate, assaulting a Prison Guard, attempted escape, selling drugs; but yes, I would include possession of illegal substances, if that is indeed a felony. But, as I said, only for anyone already serving a life sentence. It would certainly help with overcrowded prisons.
Logged
12th Doctor
supersoulty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,584
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2007, 02:56:50 AM »

I always knew Teddy would get his come-upence
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2007, 03:01:30 AM »

Louisiana will be a good state to live in once Blanco crawls back in her hole.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2007, 03:25:15 AM »

But, as I said, only for anyone already serving a life sentence. It would certainly help with overcrowded prisons.

I think not having silly laws on the books will help more than executing citizens in cutting down on overcrowded prisons.

Louisiana will be a good state to live in once Blanco crawls back in her hole.

Yes, now that those annoying black people are gone.  Republican pride!
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,207
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2007, 07:21:17 AM »

I was thinking more along the lines of Assaulting another inmate, assaulting a Prison Guard, attempted escape, selling drugs; but yes, I would include possession of illegal substances, if that is indeed a felony. But, as I said, only for anyone already serving a life sentence. It would certainly help with overcrowded prisons.
Attempted escape is not even illegal in sane countries.
Logged
DWPerry
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,674
Puerto Rico


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2007, 12:08:58 PM »

I think not having silly laws on the books will help... in cutting down on overcrowded prisons.

I agree, however, we may disagree on what is a "silly law"
Logged
HardRCafé
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,364
Italy
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2007, 07:27:46 PM »

Yes, now that those annoying black people are gone.  Republican pride!

It's sad you're so insecure in your ideology, you back it up with baseless allegations of racism instead of actual argumentation to support it.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 27, 2007, 05:05:22 AM »
« Edited: May 27, 2007, 05:07:04 AM by Ebowed »

Attempted escape is not even illegal in sane countries.

Really?  What's the logic behind that?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,207
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2007, 05:14:53 AM »

Attempted escape is not even illegal in sane countries.

Really?  What's the logic behind that?
The logic is that a prisoner has every right to do that.

Of course, he'll lose all chance of an early release. And of course, it's illegal to help spring others from jail, which in practice means it's also illegal to attempt escape in groups.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2007, 11:06:05 PM »

Attempted escape is not even illegal in sane countries.

Really?  What's the logic behind that?
The logic is that a prisoner has every right to do that.

Of course, he'll lose all chance of an early release. And of course, it's illegal to help spring others from jail, which in practice means it's also illegal to attempt escape in groups.


Punishments for attempted crimes find their genesis in early English and American common law and exist in no other legal systems.

Early English and American common law regarded these crimes as misdemeanors, only later American criminal statutes (post-1900) regarded these crimes as felonies.  That is how it stands nowadays - England still regards attempted crimes as misdemeanors.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,207
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2007, 04:52:42 AM »

Attempted escape is not even illegal in sane countries.

Really?  What's the logic behind that?
The logic is that a prisoner has every right to do that.

Of course, he'll lose all chance of an early release. And of course, it's illegal to help spring others from jail, which in practice means it's also illegal to attempt escape in groups.


Punishments for attempted crimes find their genesis in early English and American common law and exist in no other legal systems.

Early English and American common law regarded these crimes as misdemeanors, only later American criminal statutes (post-1900) regarded these crimes as felonies.  That is how it stands nowadays - England still regards attempted crimes as misdemeanors.
Same goes if you successfully escape (and get caught again years later), though.
Logged
Peter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,030


Political Matrix
E: -0.77, S: -7.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 29, 2007, 08:34:49 AM »

This will be interestsing once it reaches the Court

There is no way the Court doesn't take this case - it has been obsessed with death penalty cases in recent years - it will take the chance to explore another alcove of it.

I would have to agree with Mr Spade that the case will hinge on Justice Kennedy. Chief Justice Roberts has shown little sympathy to the liberal bloc on this issue, and I do not see Justice Alito, a former prosecutor, parting ways with the conservative bloc.

Justice Kennedy was in the majority of Roper, Atkins and House - all of these ended up favouring the liberal bloc - all recent decisions in capital punishment case law. However, do not bet against Justice Kennedy conscience deciding that the horrific nature of a crime against a child can override his previous drift to the left. He is a sentimentalist after all.
Logged
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 30, 2007, 12:24:46 PM »

The fact that the death penalty is disproportionate to the crime of rape was supposedly established (in Coker) by the fact that only one state authorized capital punishment for rapists. I don't know what the situation is now, but when Coker was decided, only three states authorized capital punishment for child rapists. If forty-nine states represent a "national consensus" that the death penalty is disproportionate to rape of an adult, then surely forty-seven states can be said to represent a "national consensus" that the death penalty is disproportionate to rape of a child. Between forty-nine and forty-seven, I see no meaningful difference.

Needless to say, this notion of counting up states while interpreting the Eighth Amendment is unsound--but the Supreme Court has adopted it nevertheless, so one is forced to conclude that the Louisiana Supreme Court probably erred.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 07, 2007, 03:58:23 PM »

Attempted escape is not even illegal in sane countries.

Really?  What's the logic behind that?
The logic is that a prisoner has every right to do that.

Of course, he'll lose all chance of an early release. And of course, it's illegal to help spring others from jail, which in practice means it's also illegal to attempt escape in groups.


Punishments for attempted crimes find their genesis in early English and American common law and exist in no other legal systems.

Early English and American common law regarded these crimes as misdemeanors, only later American criminal statutes (post-1900) regarded these crimes as felonies.  That is how it stands nowadays - England still regards attempted crimes as misdemeanors.
Not true. Attempted murder is a crime under Portuguese (civil) law.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 07, 2007, 08:33:56 PM »

Attempted escape is not even illegal in sane countries.

Really?  What's the logic behind that?
The logic is that a prisoner has every right to do that.

Of course, he'll lose all chance of an early release. And of course, it's illegal to help spring others from jail, which in practice means it's also illegal to attempt escape in groups.


Punishments for attempted crimes find their genesis in early English and American common law and exist in no other legal systems.

Early English and American common law regarded these crimes as misdemeanors, only later American criminal statutes (post-1900) regarded these crimes as felonies.  That is how it stands nowadays - England still regards attempted crimes as misdemeanors.
Not true. Attempted murder is a crime under Portuguese (civil) law.

Interesting, I didn't know that (though I don't swear to be an expert in Portuguese law).  Smiley
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,695
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 13, 2007, 09:00:43 PM »

So in these civil law countries (besides Portugal), you  could shoot at someone and not be tried for anything if you miss? (no attempted murder)

This is assuming of course that it's legal to own the gun in that country of course.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,028
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: June 13, 2007, 10:13:38 PM »

LET 'EM FRY!
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,207
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: June 14, 2007, 04:49:52 AM »

So in these civil law countries (besides Portugal), you  could shoot at someone and not be tried for anything if you miss? (no attempted murder)
No.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: January 05, 2008, 01:15:38 AM »

Cert. granted; see here. "The brief of petitioner is to be filed on or before Thursday, February 14, 2008. The brief of respondent is to be filed on or before Wednesday, March 12, 2008."

My prediction is that we'll be looking at a 6-3 or 7-2 reversal.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: June 25, 2008, 09:26:41 AM »

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/07-343.pdf

Reversed, 5-4. The court's holding is categorical: "The Eighth Amendment bars Louisiana from imposing the death penalty for the rape of a child where the crime did not result, and was not intended to result, in the victim's death."
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: June 25, 2008, 09:39:38 AM »

Kennedy's logic on this one is particularly amusing, by just skimming through the opinion.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.049 seconds with 13 queries.