Roy Moore 2004 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 05:06:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  Roy Moore 2004 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Roy Moore 2004  (Read 29843 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


« on: February 04, 2004, 08:50:31 AM »

Moore won't be another Wallace... but if he ran he would do far better than Nader did...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2004, 11:19:20 AM »

When I said that Moore would do better than Nader, I meant he would have a chance of getting over 10% in several states (AL, MS, SC), though I doubt he would win as high a % of the national vote as Nader did.
His vote would be much more concentrated and therefore would be more "important"
Sorry... I have a weird way of thinking sometimes Smiley

BTW Riley's re-election rate is a mere 38%
Sigelman in a cakewalk.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2004, 12:36:03 PM »

JMF, what version of the Bible is that? (just curious, not being offensive or seeking trouble etc.)
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2004, 09:59:35 AM »

Politics1:
Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2004, 12:22:42 PM »

Right click on the image you want to copy, click on "properties", copy the URL that then comes up, put img inside [] paste the URL and put /img inside a []
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2004, 05:46:03 AM »

Moore might be able to poll well in Alabama and Mississippi (though I doubt that he'd win either state) and O.K in a few other Southern States... but I don't see him polling a higher % than Perot in '96
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,713
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2004, 03:07:53 PM »

In recent history SOutherners have been rather reluctant to vote third party. Perot scored worst there, so did Nader, so did Anderson.
Seems they lost interest in voting third parties after 1968...Or maybe it's because voting patterns are now so strongly determined by race.
Doesn't bode well for a third party candidate who's logical base in SOuthern. Let me once more remind you of what happened to Buchanan.

Buchanan's running was Black...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.