Not necessarily. Now, I will agree that Oklahoma is very likely going to remain Republican in the Senate, but its not impossible for Inhofe to lose. He is not very well liked amongst his own state. However, the state has a much better chance of flipping in the Presidential race than in the Senate race, but neither is impossible. I think... wait, I KNOW, the federal Democrats have a very good shot in Oklahoma this time around due to several factors which I've already mentioned.
Please, do not laugh at me every time I mention Oklahoma possibly going Democrat. I have very legitimate reasons for saying such and, frankly, it is very immature when you laugh and ridicule me for my analysis. You seriously don't think I know anything about Oklahoma if I say Democrats have a chance. I know I am immature for constantly whining about it, but how would you feel if someone constantly kept scoffing at your comments every time you made them.
It is also GUARANTEED that the 2008 map will look NOTHING like 2004.
It's not fair, I know, but everyone laughs and rips at you because we all believe—for very good reason—that your predictions are clouded by wishful thinking and have little grounding in reality. Maybe you'll be right and we'll all be proven wrong! (Don't hold your breath.)
I don't go around insisting that Massachusetts could possibly be in play for Republicans in 2008 (Giuliani is a different kind of candidate and is socially liberal and has connections with the Italian community and Kerry has low approvals and the map is changing and whatever) and that maybe there's an outside chance that Kerry could get ousted by, say, that Ogonowski dude. But if I did, feel free to mock and ridicule, because that's just as ridiculous as a Dem pick up in Oklahoma by a "true progressive."