California change to distirct method proceeding (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 05:02:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Process (Moderator: muon2)
  California change to distirct method proceeding (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: California change to distirct method proceeding  (Read 7144 times)
zorkpolitics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,188
United States


« on: November 24, 2007, 04:16:07 PM »

Although only ME and NE currently allocate Electoral Votes by Congressional district (and 2 to the state winner), supporters of an initiative to change the CA allocation of electoral votes is on track to collect the signatures needed.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/7002.html
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/politics/20071119-9999-1n19elect.html

So far about 400,000 signatures have been collected of the 700,000 goal (434,000 valid signatures required).

If passed (and the only poll I saw had it favored) CA 55 for-sure Electoral Votes for the Democratic candidate in 2008 would be split, around 35-D and 20-R. 
 
If a Republican were to win in 2008 because of the "extra" votes form CA, do you think that would inspire either:
1) More states to go by districts?
2) More support to switch to the National Popular Vote method?  Which currently has passed only one state (http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/index.php)?
3) Just more gnashing of teeth that the Republican Stole the election?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.