Biggest President Forever Turnout.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 05:48:22 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Election and History Games (Moderator: Dereich)
  Biggest President Forever Turnout.
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Biggest President Forever Turnout.  (Read 3739 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: November 28, 2007, 06:22:04 AM »

I just played a 2004 primary/general campaign as myself, against Bush.

Bush won 274/264 50.3%/49.7%

The total popular vote was 151,342,908
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2007, 08:53:47 AM »

I just played a 2004 primary/general campaign as myself, against Bush.

Bush won 274/264 50.3%/49.7%

The total popular vote was 151,342,908

wtf?  That's almost >100% turnout.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2007, 10:30:09 AM »

I know - I had to double check the number a few times.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2007, 03:27:08 PM »

I thought the real turnout was 125 million which equaled something like 60% turnout? Wouldn't 150 then be something like 75%? Or am I missing something? Extraordinarily high by American standards anyway of course, given how 2004 had a high turnout to begin with.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2007, 04:18:20 PM »

I thought the real turnout was 125 million which equaled something like 60% turnout? Wouldn't 150 then be something like 75%? Or am I missing something? Extraordinarily high by American standards anyway of course, given how 2004 had a high turnout to begin with.

2004 U.S. VAP was about 218 million.  However, 2004 registered voters numbered 168 million, plus those in North Dakota and Wisconsin (no voter registration numbers kept), plus same-day registrations.

It would be insanely high turnout.
Logged
Gabu
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,386
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.32, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2007, 11:40:13 PM »

I thought the real turnout was 125 million which equaled something like 60% turnout? Wouldn't 150 then be something like 75%? Or am I missing something? Extraordinarily high by American standards anyway of course, given how 2004 had a high turnout to begin with.

As Alcon said, it would be 75% of the total voting age population, but over 90% of registered voters.
Logged
Gustaf
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,775


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -0.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: December 13, 2007, 08:18:06 PM »

Ah, of course the registered voters stuff you go with in the US. I had forgotten about that. No further questions.
Logged
CultureKing
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,249
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2007, 05:54:33 AM »

I just had a Clinton-Huckabee-Bloomberg scenario that had a popular vote total of 198.4 million, so basically everyone who could vote did.

Oh and the results for those curious:
Huckabee: 37.1% (366 EC)
Clinton: 33.1% (172 EC)
Bloomberg: 29.8% (none)

I played as Bloomberg and I was amazed that with about 30% of the vote I didnt win ANY states...
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 08, 2008, 06:03:21 PM »

In the 1932 scenario, with Hoover v. Roosevelt v. Thomas v. Foster, there was a turnout of 142,585,742, while in the actual 1932 election the turnout was just 39,751,898.
Logged
Robespierre's Jaw
Senator Conor Flynn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,129
Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: -8.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 08, 2008, 06:06:03 PM »

In the 1932 scenario, with Hoover v. Roosevelt v. Thomas v. Foster, there was a turnout of 142,585,742, while in the actual 1932 election the turnout was just 39,751,898.

I believe in the scenario folder the guy that made it, put 150 voter turn out.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.