Who would win in a logic-based argument between MikeyCNY and Inks.LWC?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Inks really. While his logic could use some, well, a lot of work, at least he uses the basic structure of an argument, rather than throwing a ridiculous blatantly false ad hominem attack at someone, watching it be debunked, then ignoring that and using the same ad hominem attack, or hilariously using the future to argue he present.

This is a Mikey style argument:

Person A: Man I can't wait till I have all that money and I'm a millionaire!
Person B: What makes you think you're going to become a millionaire?
Person A: My stocks in X Company. They're no doubt going to soar and I'll become rich.
Person B: Huh? X Company isn't doing all that well lately, they're dropping in value...
Person A: Whatever. Just wait a month until I'm rich and then you'll wish you had been like me and bought those stocks. I'm going to laugh SOOOO hard at you then and you're going to regret everything you said, and being the paid shill you are for their main competitor Y Company.
Person B: Uh, I don't care about Y Company at all. In fact I own a few shares of X Company myself, I hope it does well, but there's no reason not too.
Persona A: Blah blah blah, whatever. Go back to sucking Y Company's CEO's cock you shill.

[Хahar 🤔]

Amen.

[Ebowed]

MikeyCNY, because he's just joking, whereas Inks is being serious.

[Eraserhead]

All I know is that Inks is a cool person to talk to, while I'm not even sure if MikeyCNY is an actual person at all.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

All I know is that Inks is a cool person to talk to, while I'm not even sure if MikeyCNY is an actual person at all.

You got a point there. Despite his awful politics, Inks is still polite to everyone despite getting tons of crap. Sort of the right wing version of opebo who gets loads piled on him but never really dishes it out.