"Mike Huckabee and the Coming Republican Realignment"
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 04:01:02 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  "Mike Huckabee and the Coming Republican Realignment"
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: "Mike Huckabee and the Coming Republican Realignment"  (Read 2920 times)
AltWorlder
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,844


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: 3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 09, 2008, 08:46:06 PM »

Insightful article, some good comments.
Does it have any bearing on reality, however?
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2008, 09:05:55 PM »

If only he ditched the UnfairTax, I would like him.

BTW, I voted option 2 in the poll.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,936


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2008, 09:49:07 PM »

I wouldn't like being split between a sort of European liberal party and a populist party. I mean, I guess economic issues are more important to me, but I'm also not a big fan of theocracy.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 10, 2008, 01:06:23 AM »

It would be interesting for the Republican and Democratic parties return to their respective 19th century positions, updated for 125 years of history.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 10, 2008, 01:23:21 AM »

It would be interesting for the Republican and Democratic parties return to their respective 19th century positions, updated for 125 years of history.

Civil War-era or Gilded Age-era? As you well know, there is a large difference.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,936


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 10, 2008, 01:27:47 AM »

Assuming Gilded Age, was there really a difference between the Republicans and Democrats? Except for the Cleveland and Bryan wings, the Democratic party was essentially a pro-business, quasi-laissez faire party just like the Republicans.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2008, 02:40:31 PM »

I wouldn't describe the 19th Century Republicans of either the Civil War/Reconstruction-era or the Gilded Age as laissez faire.  They differed somewhat on which government subsidies needed doing most, but not on the general principle of government action to stimulate the economy.

The principle difference for the Republicans of the two eras is that by the Gilded Age they lost their zeal for social reform.
Logged
The Hack Hater
AloneinOregon
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 371
Virgin Islands, British


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2008, 03:02:41 PM »

I'm still really not sure if Huckabee's populism reflects an overall trends or not. The elite of the party isn't too happy with his more"big government" approach., as many may know.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.