If dems did winner takes all

[Iosif is a COTHO]

Assuming the total pledged delegates is the same:


Obama: 1190
Clinton: 1075

That doesn't include MI and FL or the superdelegates.


So Obama would have a bigger lead in that case.  (But would be more susceptible to a fall in Ohio and Texas)

[Iosif is a COTHO]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

IA, SC, AL, AK, CO, CT, DE, GA, ID, IL, KS, MN, MO, ND, UT, LA, NE, WA, ME, DC, VI, MD, VA. 


Lots of small states tend to beat a few big states. Though as I said, were it WTA, Clinton would be in a better position now because of Ohio and Texas. Obama would have to win one of them.

[Iosif is a COTHO]

Ah well, funnily enough TPM Election Central has done the same thing today and come up with slightly different numbers. Where did I give Obama the extra ones, I wonder

Edit: I got ahead of myself and gave him Hawaii and Wisconsin! Oops.

   Delegates
Obama   1,096
Clinton   1,075

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/hillary_would_have_benefitted.php#more