Official March 4th Results Discussion Topic (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 06:40:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Official March 4th Results Discussion Topic (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Official March 4th Results Discussion Topic  (Read 56269 times)
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« on: March 04, 2008, 06:56:36 PM »

The Democratic ballots apparently outnumbered the GOP by a large margin, according to a poll worker. 

In Clermont county? Haha, wow.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2008, 07:02:55 PM »

CNN projects Vermont for Obama and McCain

shock
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2008, 07:12:21 PM »

I just did that same math, and came up with the same thing.  We'll see if the exit polls hold up (early exit polls overestimated Obama in VT, after all...)

Well. The early figures overestimated him relative to the figures released on close of poll. Slight difference.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2008, 07:35:32 PM »

In Ohio the main areas to look out for should, stress "should", be the more urban of the various traditional industrial areas (this is not the same thing as areas with the highest percentage of manufacturing jobs. Just thought I'd point that out). Not so much for who wins, but by how much. The rural areas don't matter, Columbus doesn't matter (much), the Southeast of the state (especially) doesn't matter. What matters is the margins (in raw votes as much as percentages) in the sort of areas mentioned above.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2008, 07:38:37 PM »

Obama is winning in Cuyahoga County. I wasn't expecting that....

Cleveland has a large black population (obviously) and the county itself has some rather upscale suburban areas mostly (IIRC) east of the city).
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2008, 07:43:42 PM »


All gone. Most of it anyway. There's a reason why the rust belt is called that.

(actually there are still about 80,000 manufacturing jobs left in that county. But that's nothing on what was the case just a few decades back and about 20,000 less than was the case in 2000).

Yeah except the manufacturing workers in Cleveland are mostly black.

No. Really, really, no.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2008, 07:44:51 PM »

Aren't there also a good amount of ethnics there (thinking Kucinich's CD).

Oui. Will be interesting to see how different the results are in the 10th and 11th CDs.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2008, 07:47:58 PM »

Well what I meant was that Cleveland is majority black.

IIRC Cleveland City isn't even a majority of Cuyahoga county anymore.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2008, 07:50:20 PM »

Aren't there also a good amount of ethnics there (thinking Kucinich's CD).

Oui. Will be interesting to see how different the results are in the 10th and 11th CDs.
Yeah especially to see how Catholic and Orthodox ethnic Eastern Europeans vote, compared to those in MA.

Or Chicago actually. Some interesting patterns there didst go not noticed.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2008, 08:05:10 PM »

It's one o clock, I've got stuff to do tomorrow and I've no dog in this race.

Nos da.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2008, 07:06:23 AM »

Very, very interesting results, yes.

In Ohio the main areas to look out for should, stress "should", be the more urban of the various traditional industrial areas (this is not the same thing as areas with the highest percentage of manufacturing jobs. Just thought I'd point that out). Not so much for who wins, but by how much. The rural areas don't matter, Columbus doesn't matter (much), the Southeast of the state (especially) doesn't matter. What matters is the margins (in raw votes as much as percentages) in the sort of areas mentioned above.

Always nice to get something right (more or less) even if it was a little obvious Smiley
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2008, 07:07:41 AM »

Yes. Obama will win the district but Hillary will do very, very well among the whites in South Philly.

Didn't South Philly vote for Reagan?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #12 on: March 05, 2008, 07:10:15 AM »

What's with Obama only leading by 2% Cuyahoga?

More like 7 or so now, but the answer is still the same; white ethnics.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


« Reply #13 on: March 05, 2008, 03:53:12 PM »

Yes. Obama will win the district but Hillary will do very, very well among the whites in South Philly.

Didn't South Philly vote for Reagan?

Actually, they did.

Ah. Well, we all know how urban-ethnic-working class areas that first disliked and then grew to loath Carter have gone this year...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 13 queries.