What if: Iraq's al-Anbar province is apart of the British Mandate of Palestine
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 07:11:06 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  What if: Iraq's al-Anbar province is apart of the British Mandate of Palestine
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What if: Iraq's al-Anbar province is apart of the British Mandate of Palestine  (Read 1756 times)
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 12, 2008, 08:41:52 PM »

What if: Iran's al-Anbar province is apart of the British Mandate of Palestine and is subsequently included in Transjordan (later the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan).

- Al-Anbar is universally Sunni Arab (98% to 99%).
- Saddam had a strong contingent of followers there.
- Was problematic for the US army to stabilize in the wake of Saddam's downfall.

How would this effect Iraq?
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2008, 09:19:48 PM »

Wouldn't ever happen, at least not all of al-Anbar.  I can't see the 7 districts along the Euphrates and Tigris being incorporated into Palestine.  Maybe some of the largish Ar Rutba district if they wanted to give Transjordan more desert, but that would be about it.
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2008, 11:07:06 PM »

Wouldn't ever happen, at least not all of al-Anbar.  I can't see the 7 districts along the Euphrates and Tigris being incorporated into Palestine.  Maybe some of the largish Ar Rutba district if they wanted to give Transjordan more desert, but that would be about it.

Do you envision some of Iraq's more homogeneous Sunni Arab governates being included in the French Mandate of Syria somehow?
Logged
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 13, 2008, 01:14:52 AM »

Wouldn't ever happen, at least not all of al-Anbar.  I can't see the 7 districts along the Euphrates and Tigris being incorporated into Palestine.  Maybe some of the largish Ar Rutba district if they wanted to give Transjordan more desert, but that would be about it.

Do you envision some of Iraq's more homogeneous Sunni Arab governates being included in the French Mandate of Syria somehow?

The problem is that the Europeans were mostly focused on keeping the boundaries in the high desert, where few people live anyway. No likely redrawing of the boundaries would have had more than a negligible impact.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 13, 2008, 04:02:25 PM »

Do you envision some of Iraq's more homogeneous Sunni Arab governates being included in the French Mandate of Syria somehow?

No, but if something closer to Sykes-Picot had been followed, then Iraqi Kurdistan (including Mosul) would have been part of the French mandates.  Britain definitely wanted a land corridor for a Cairo-Baghdad railroad, so moving any part of al-Anbar to French control wasn't likely at all.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 13 queries.