New SUSA polls
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 04:10:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
  2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
  New SUSA polls
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: New SUSA polls  (Read 2223 times)
Floridude
Rookie
**
Posts: 177


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: August 19, 2004, 09:14:15 PM »

If you buy these new polls today for the senate you gotta be pretty happy if your a GOPer unless SUSA has swung violently to the right.

Chew on this data, im not too great at that.

South Carolina

DeMinRt-52%
TenenbaumD-39%

Colorado

CoorsR48%
SalazarD 47%

Oklahoma

CoburnR-47%
Carson D-44%

California

BoxerD-48%
JonesR-42%

I think we should be able to keep the senate.  Others are better at analyzing data than I so help


Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2004, 09:19:05 PM »

I doubt Boxer is up by only 6 points. But if that poll if accurate, I guess Boxer should start taking Jones seriously (well...maybe she shouldn't. She should ignore him and maybe he'll actually win. Now there is something for conservatives to hope for Smiley )
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2004, 11:25:14 PM »
« Edited: January 05, 2005, 07:55:03 PM by Jake »

If that California poll was taken at the same time as the presidential poll, which I assume it was.  The SUSA folks seriously oversampled the GOP.

Actually polled
40% GOP
37% DEM
22% INP

2000 Turnout
43% DEM
35% GOP
22% INP

Thanks to Vorlon for the data.
Logged
Q
QQQQQQ
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,319


Political Matrix
E: 2.26, S: -4.88

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2004, 04:24:04 PM »

If that California poll was taken at the same time as the presidential poll, which I assume it was.  The SUSA folks seriously oversampled the voters.

Don't you mean "oversampled Republicans"?  Freudian slip, perhaps?
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2004, 05:19:32 PM »

If that California poll was taken at the same time as the presidential poll, which I assume it was.  The SUSA folks seriously oversampled the voters.

Don't you mean "oversampled Republicans"?  Freudian slip, perhaps?

yeah thanks.
Logged
JNB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 395


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2004, 05:25:25 PM »


  The OK number seems to be a tad Dem heavy, the SC numbers seems about right, the CO number seems a tad GOP heavy, and the CA number is fantasy land.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.211 seconds with 16 queries.