PA PrimD: CNN/Time: Clinton leads by 8
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 06:04:36 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  PA PrimD: CNN/Time: Clinton leads by 8
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PA PrimD: CNN/Time: Clinton leads by 8  (Read 1373 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 09, 2008, 11:56:35 PM »

New Poll: Pennsylvania President by CNN/Time on 2008-04-06

Summary:
Clinton:
49%
Obama:
41%
Other:
0%
Undecided:
10%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2008, 09:05:11 AM »

Ah, more crappy companies trying to poll PA.  Smiley
Logged
agcatter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,740


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2008, 09:15:11 AM »

Polls seem to all show that the Clinton slide has at least been halted.

I think she'll win it by 9 or 10 in the final analysis.  But hey, what do I know about Democratic primary voters in Pennsylvania.  Answer:  just enough to be dangerous.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2008, 09:25:21 AM »
« Edited: April 10, 2008, 09:27:58 AM by Wiz in Wis »

Has anyone else noticed that Obama does worse when fewer people are called. I think polling fewer than 1000 people may be undercutting his strengths among blacks and young people. But, then again, it may just be a wierd phenomena.

Also of note, Time is trumpeting this as a 6 point margin (44-38).
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2008, 09:50:39 AM »

It's 44-38 without "leaners" included.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2008, 10:34:12 AM »

No slinde for Clinton, maybe a slight uptick.
Logged
they don't love you like i love you
BRTD
Atlas Prophet
*****
Posts: 112,921
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.50, S: -6.67

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2008, 10:36:05 AM »

No slinde for Clinton, maybe a slight uptick.

LOL. Using the same logic you used in Wisconsin I should argue Obama is making massive gains due to that SUSA poll.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2008, 10:58:23 AM »

Has anyone else noticed that Obama does worse when fewer people are called. I think polling fewer than 1000 people may be undercutting his strengths among blacks and young people. But, then again, it may just be a wierd phenomena.

Weird coincidence, I'd think.  I don't see why blacks and young people would be more likely to be called after other people were called...
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 10, 2008, 11:13:48 AM »

No slinde for Clinton, maybe a slight uptick.

LOL. Using the same logic you used in Wisconsin I should argue Obama is making massive gains due to that SUSA poll.

Except, he have most, if not all the more recent polls showing Clinton gains or holding.  PPP had Obama at 2 now Clinton at 3, the 'bots are unchanged, the IA poll has a 7 point gain, and I'm calling it holding.

Zack the Barak hack does like to spin.
Logged
Wiz in Wis
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,711


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 10, 2008, 11:13:57 AM »

Has anyone else noticed that Obama does worse when fewer people are called. I think polling fewer than 1000 people may be undercutting his strengths among blacks and young people. But, then again, it may just be a wierd phenomena.

Weird coincidence, I'd think.  I don't see why blacks and young people would be more likely to be called after other people were called...

Point well taken, my only reason for thinking this is that what crosstabs I have seen seem to indicate that in smaller samples, Clinton runs better among those demos. This could all be a moot point though. The two things that will decide the ultimate "winner" of PA are the head to heads against McCain (hurts Obama) and the number of delegates Clinton can reasonably expect to win with a 10-15% margin (hurts Clinton).
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 14 queries.